Cited by 19Family Dynamics and RelationshipsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Relationship dynamics and divorcing mothers’ adjustment: Moderating role of marital violence, negative life events, and social support

Hardesty, Jennifer L., Ogolsky, Brian G., Raffaelli, Marcela, Whittaker, Angela·2019·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

Longitudinal associations between postseparation relationship stressors (coparenting conflict and harassment) and health outcomes (depressive, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD], and physical health symptoms) as moderated by contextual factors (i.e., marital intimate partner violence [IPV], negative life events, and social support) were examined in a sample of divorcing mothers. Respondents were 135 mothers recruited within 4 months of a divorce filing who participated in five interviews at 3-month intervals over a 1-year period. Multilevel modeling procedures used to account for the repeated assessments over time revealed direct associations between postseparation stressors and health outcomes differing based on IPV and negative life events. For example, coparenting conflict after separation was associated with higher levels of depressive, PTSD, and physical health symptoms among mothers who experienced no violence, whereas the opposite pattern was observed among mothers whose marriages were characterized by coercive controlling violence. Negative life events magnified that negative impact of coparenting conflict on mental and physical health. Contrary to expectation, social support did not diminish the negative health effects of postseparation stressors. Findings support the value of examining how distinct postseparation factors are associated with divorcing mothers’ health within the broader context against which the divorce process plays out.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407519833178

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-parenting conflict has been studied separately from co-parenting in the context of IPV.

    “Co-parenting conflict has been studied separately from co-parenting in the context of IPV (Hardesty et al., 2019), or they have been lumped together making it difficult to differentiate post-separation abuse from non-abusive conflict.”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Hardesty et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardesty, J. L., Ogolsky, B. G., Raffaelli, M., & Whittaker, A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Hardesty, Jennifer L.
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
36
Issue
11-12
Pages
3651-3672
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2920432597
Cited by
19
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD061559A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
divorce, coparenting conflict, negative life events, social support, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, somatic symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review