The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews three visual methods based on drawing that I applied in my research on young people: the arts-based projective technique, the self-portrait, and the graphic elicitation methods of the relational map and the timeline. Examples of these methods are drawn from their application in two studies, the Narratives of Identity and Migration project, exploring young people and identities in England and Italy, and the Young Lives and Times. The article argues that applying these drawing methods in the context of an interview can open up participants’ interpretations of questions, and allow a creative way of interviewing that is responsive to participants’ own meanings and associations. The article discusses the analytical potential of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods, by making reference to the insights that they offered in the contextual analysis with more traditional text-based data. The efficacy of these methods is critically discussed, together with their limitations, and their potential within the context of qualitative longitudinal research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giddens, A. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-62 · Cited by 4,813
Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation
Lieblich, A., Tuval‐Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,251
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781412985253 · Cited by 1,826
Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way
Mason, J. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106058866 · Cited by 828
Creative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences
Gauntlett, D. (2007) · Cited by 355
Gauntlett, D. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203961407 · Cited by 332
Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli
Crilly, N., Blackwell, A. F., & Clarkson, P. J. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106065007 · Cited by 296
Weber, S. (2008) · Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues · doi:10.4135/9781452226545.n4 · Cited by 291
The Space between Us: Exploring the Dimensions of Human Relationships
Acitelli, L. K., & Josselson, R. (1996) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353994 · Cited by 231
Eisner, E. (2008) · Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues · doi:10.4135/9781452226545.n1 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research
Schultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001 · Cited by 522
Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. C., & van Leeuwen, T. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.781867 · Cited by 499
Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241296206 · Cited by 416
On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture
Rose, G. (2014) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.12109 · Cited by 379
Timelining: visualizing experience
Sheridan, J., Chamberlain, K., & Dupuis, A. (2011) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794111413235 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagnoli, A.
- Venue
- Qualitative Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-570
- ISSN
- 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3109
- OpenAlex
- W2125156878
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 54.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1468794109343625
- The paper
- Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.