The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers
Open accessAbstract
When conducting qualitative research, the modern-day researcher has a variety of options available in order to collect data from participants. Although traditional face-to-face interviews remain prominent, innovative communication technologies, such as Skype, have facilitated new modes of communication. While potential research populations have become increasingly geographically dispersed, technological advancements and software have made communicating over large distances more feasible. Because of this, research is no longer limited to face-to-face accessible participants, as online methods have facilitated access to global research participants. This article presents the experiences of two PhD researchers using Skype to interview participants. While findings show that there are benefits and drawbacks to the utility of Skype, this article argues that synchronous online interviewing is a useful supplement or replacement to face-to-face interviews. Concluding comments acknowledge that more research is required to more comprehensively understand how technologies challenge the basic assumptions of the traditional face-to-face interview.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Cited by
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164
“Other studies have found that Skype participants were typically more responsive, and built rapport more quickly, than face-to-face participants (Deakin & Wakefield, 2014; Tuttas, 2015).”
BackgroundThe Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders
Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318786781 · Cited by 319
Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565 · Cited by 280
Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work
DeFilippis, E., Impink, S. M., Singell, M., Polzer, J., & Sadun, R. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w27612 · Cited by 273
Mumford, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103706 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K.
- Venue
- Qualitative Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 603-616
- ISSN
- 1468-7941 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3109
- OpenAlex
- W2018185315
- Cited by
- 856
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1468794113488126
- The paper
- Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.