The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews
Open accessAbstract
Covid-19 has changed the way research can be conducted. The present literature review, based on 29 studies (2008–2020), investigates and compiles existing research to identify possibilities and limitations of using digital interviews within social work, sociology and adjacent disciplines. The results show that digital interviews can enhance long-distance participation, and that they may be cost-effective. However, technical difficulties can arise that adversely affect the quality of the interviews. Concerning sensitive topics (e.g., victimization, health issues, sexuality), more rich data can be reached with digital options than with in-person options, but it can be difficult to read visual cues, as the camera only captures the participants’ upper body. Based on these results, it is important to strike a balance between the positive and negative aspects associated with digital interviews, and to understand that digital interviews are something different than in-person interviews, with their own logic and rules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5664 · Cited by 4,089
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164 · cited 3×
“In some cases, participants were unfamiliar with the program, requiring the researcher to instruct the participants in using the system, which can take time from the interview (e.g., Alkhateeb, 2018; Archibald et al., 2019; N. Fielding, 2010; Lo Iacono et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodIs there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?
Novick, G. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20259 · Cited by 1,353
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232009 · Cited by 1,172
Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research
Opdenakker, R. (2008) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-7.4.175 · Cited by 1,148
Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794113488126 · Cited by 856
Kozinets, R. V. (2015) · The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067 · Cited by 635
Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications
Gray, L., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G., & Cook, K. (2020) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212 · Cited by 625
Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews
Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.3952 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 757-768
- ISSN
- 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5300
- OpenAlex
- W3168391508
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 60.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565
- The paper
- Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.