The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence
Abstract
The key element of Web 2.0 is what O’Reilly refers to as an ‘architecture of participation’. Taglines such as YouTube’s ‘broadcast yourself ’ and Lulu’s ‘publish your words, your art — for fun or profit’ point to the creative empowerment that has accompanied the mass adoption of digital technologies and the rise of Web 2.0 applications. Combined with the ‘rip, mix and burn’ nature of digital technologies, the Web has rapidly become a locus for user-created content, much of which copies, appropriates and mashes up copyrighted materials. The invitation to engage with the media-saturated environment has led to a proliferation of prosumerism through which many consumers have become producers of content. Appropriation and redeployment of copyrighted materials in the prosumption arena has drawn creators and right holders into conflict. Copyright owners seek to maintain control over information flows, whilst prosumers make (what they consider to be) fair uses of elements harvested from the media-saturated environment. This article is concerned with these tensions that — whilst not new — have been exacerbated by Web 2.0. Specifically, this article addresses the issue of fairness (in the context of the US fair use doctrine) in the digital age and questions whether powerful cultural forces require a reconfiguration of copyright law. Fairness is an elusive concept; in the realm of copyright, an act may simultaneously be decried as piracy and defended as a fair use. Web 2.0 has fostered…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It follows that digital economic circulations are not merely everyday encounters enabled with and between software (Thrift, 2005), but are actually constituted through and by what can be accordingly conceived of in various socio-technical and material terms as 'infrastructures' (Beer, 2013), 'architectures' (Collins, 2010) and 'ecosystems ' (van Dijck, 2013).”
From Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation (2017) · cites this paper as Collins, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers, Independent Feature Project, International Documentary Association, National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture, and Women in Film & Video (Washington, DC, chapter), 2005, ‘Documentary Filmmakers’ Statement of Best Practice in Fair Use’
- Aufderheide, P., 2008, ‘Recut, Reframe, Recycle: Quoting Copyright Material in User-Generated Video’
- Bangeman, E., 2007, Ars Technica
- Blagden, C., 1960, The Stationers’ Company: A History, 1403-1959
- Bowrey, K., 1996, European Intellectual Property Review, 18, 322
- 10.1215/9780822382492 · DOI
- Deazley, R., 2004, On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth Century Britain (1695-1775). Oxford
- Feather, J., 1980, Publishing History, 8, 19
- Feather, J., 1988, European Intellectual Property Review, 12, 377
- Feather, J., 1994, Publishing, Piracy and Politics: An Historical Study of Copyright in Britain
- Gibson, W., 1989, Rolling Stone
- Hansell, S., 2008, The New York Times
- Jenkins, H., 2006, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
- 10.7312/kapl90322 · DOI
- Khare, R., 1996, WWW Journal, 1
- Kozinski, A., 1993, New York University Law Review, 68, 960
- Kraus, D., 2001, ‘The Phantom Edit’
- Lange, D., Paper presented at the Conference on the Public Domain, 9-11 November at Duke Law School
- Laningham, S., 2006, ‘DeveloperWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee’
- Lawrence, J.S. ( 1989) ‘Copyright Law, Fair Use and the Academy: An Introduction’ , in J.S. Lawrence and B. Timberg (eds) Fair Use and Free Inquiry: Copyright Law and the New Media, pp. 3-19. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
- Lenhart, A., 2005, Teen Content Creators and Consumers
- Lessig, L., 2001, The Future of Ideas
- Lessig, L., 2004, Free Culture
- 10.5040/9781849662505 · DOI · Paper page
- Malik, A., 2007, Malik’s Law
- McDonald, H., 2007, About.com: Music Careers
- McLeod, K., 2005, Freedom of Expression: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity
- McLuhan, M., 1972, Take Today: The Executive as Dropout
- Metz, C., 2007, The Register
- Negativland, 1995, Fair Use: The Story of the Letter U and the Numeral 2
- Oppenheim, C. ( 1999) ‘Copyright II: Copyright and the Internet’ , in Liberty (ed.) Liberating Cyberspace, pp.125-139. London, Sterling ,Virginia: Pluto Press.
- O’Reilly, T., 2005, O’Reilly
- Rose, M., 1993, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright
- Rose, T., 1994, Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America
- Samuels, E., 2000, The Illustrated Story of Copyright
- Sanjek, D., 1992, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 10, 607
- Sweney, M., 2007, ‘BBC Makes Deal with YouTube’
- Tapscott, D., 1996, The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence
- Tapscott, D., 2006, Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything
- Toffler, A., 1980, The Third Wave. London, Glasgow, Sydney, Auckland, Toronto
- Vaidhyanathan, S., 2003, Copyright and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity
- Weinreb, L., 1990, Harvard Law Review, 103, 1137, 10.2307/1341458 · DOI
- Waldron, J., 1993, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68, 841
- Wu, T., 2006, Slate
- YouTube, 2007, ‘Still Alive - Portal Theme Song on Piano’
- YouTube, 2007, ‘Portal - Credits Song "Still Alive"’
- YouTube, 2007, ‘ Were You Caught in the Viacom Takedown?’
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017) · Finance and Society · doi:10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936 · Cited by 989
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, S.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Collins, Steve
- ORCID
- Collins, Steve
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Culture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-55
- ISSN
- 1469-5405 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2900
- OpenAlex
- W2094216678
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Culture (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
- Keywords
- Web 2.0, fair use, copyright law, prosumption, user-generated content, appropriations, remix culture, piracy, copyright reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1469540509354014
- The paper
- Collins, S. (2010). Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence. Journal of Consumer Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354014