Cited by 54Copyright and Intellectual PropertyIntellectual Property Rights and MediaIntellectual Property Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence

Collins, Steve·2010·Journal of Consumer Culture

Abstract

The key element of Web 2.0 is what O’Reilly refers to as an ‘architecture of participation’. Taglines such as YouTube’s ‘broadcast yourself ’ and Lulu’s ‘publish your words, your art — for fun or profit’ point to the creative empowerment that has accompanied the mass adoption of digital technologies and the rise of Web 2.0 applications. Combined with the ‘rip, mix and burn’ nature of digital technologies, the Web has rapidly become a locus for user-created content, much of which copies, appropriates and mashes up copyrighted materials. The invitation to engage with the media-saturated environment has led to a proliferation of prosumerism through which many consumers have become producers of content. Appropriation and redeployment of copyrighted materials in the prosumption arena has drawn creators and right holders into conflict. Copyright owners seek to maintain control over information flows, whilst prosumers make (what they consider to be) fair uses of elements harvested from the media-saturated environment. This article is concerned with these tensions that — whilst not new — have been exacerbated by Web 2.0. Specifically, this article addresses the issue of fairness (in the context of the US fair use doctrine) in the digital age and questions whether powerful cultural forces require a reconfiguration of copyright law. Fairness is an elusive concept; in the realm of copyright, an act may simultaneously be decried as piracy and defended as a fair use. Web 2.0 has fostered…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469540509354014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers, Independent Feature Project, International Documentary Association, National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture, and Women in Film & Video (Washington, DC, chapter), 2005, ‘Documentary Filmmakers’ Statement of Best Practice in Fair Use’
  2. Aufderheide, P., 2008, ‘Recut, Reframe, Recycle: Quoting Copyright Material in User-Generated Video’
  3. Bangeman, E., 2007, Ars Technica
  4. Blagden, C., 1960, The Stationers’ Company: A History, 1403-1959
  5. Bowrey, K., 1996, European Intellectual Property Review, 18, 322
  6. 10.1215/9780822382492 · DOI
  7. Deazley, R., 2004, On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth Century Britain (1695-1775). Oxford
  8. Feather, J., 1980, Publishing History, 8, 19
  9. Feather, J., 1988, European Intellectual Property Review, 12, 377
  10. Feather, J., 1994, Publishing, Piracy and Politics: An Historical Study of Copyright in Britain
  11. Gibson, W., 1989, Rolling Stone
  12. Hansell, S., 2008, The New York Times
  13. Jenkins, H., 2006, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
  14. 10.7312/kapl90322 · DOI
  15. Khare, R., 1996, WWW Journal, 1
  16. Kozinski, A., 1993, New York University Law Review, 68, 960
  17. Kraus, D., 2001, ‘The Phantom Edit’
  18. Lange, D., Paper presented at the Conference on the Public Domain, 9-11 November at Duke Law School
  19. Laningham, S., 2006, ‘DeveloperWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee’
  20. Lawrence, J.S. ( 1989) ‘Copyright Law, Fair Use and the Academy: An Introduction’ , in J.S. Lawrence and B. Timberg (eds) Fair Use and Free Inquiry: Copyright Law and the New Media, pp. 3-19. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
  21. Lenhart, A., 2005, Teen Content Creators and Consumers
  22. Lessig, L., 2001, The Future of Ideas
  23. Lessig, L., 2004, Free Culture
  24. 10.5040/9781849662505 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Malik, A., 2007, Malik’s Law
  26. McDonald, H., 2007, About.com: Music Careers
  27. McLeod, K., 2005, Freedom of Expression: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity
  28. McLuhan, M., 1972, Take Today: The Executive as Dropout
  29. Metz, C., 2007, The Register
  30. Negativland, 1995, Fair Use: The Story of the Letter U and the Numeral 2
  31. Oppenheim, C. ( 1999) ‘Copyright II: Copyright and the Internet’ , in Liberty (ed.) Liberating Cyberspace, pp.125-139. London, Sterling ,Virginia: Pluto Press.
  32. O’Reilly, T., 2005, O’Reilly
  33. Rose, M., 1993, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright
  34. Rose, T., 1994, Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America
  35. Samuels, E., 2000, The Illustrated Story of Copyright
  36. Sanjek, D., 1992, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 10, 607
  37. Sweney, M., 2007, ‘BBC Makes Deal with YouTube’
  38. Tapscott, D., 1996, The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence
  39. Tapscott, D., 2006, Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything
  40. Toffler, A., 1980, The Third Wave. London, Glasgow, Sydney, Auckland, Toronto
  41. Vaidhyanathan, S., 2003, Copyright and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity
  42. Weinreb, L., 1990, Harvard Law Review, 103, 1137, 10.2307/1341458 · DOI
  43. Waldron, J., 1993, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68, 841
  44. Wu, T., 2006, Slate
  45. YouTube, 2007, ‘Still Alive - Portal Theme Song on Piano’
  46. YouTube, 2007, ‘Portal - Credits Song "Still Alive"’
  47. YouTube, 2007, ‘ Were You Caught in the Viacom Takedown?’

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Collins, S.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Collins, Steve
Venue
Journal of Consumer Culture
Published
2010-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
37-55
ISSN
  • 1469-5405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2900
OpenAlex
W2094216678
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Culture (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Law
Keywords
Web 2.0, fair use, copyright law, prosumption, user-generated content, appropriations, remix culture, piracy, copyright reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1469540509354014
The paper
Collins, S. (2010). Digital Fair: Prosumption and the fair use defence. Journal of Consumer Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354014