CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesLatin American history and cultureArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to Status and Identity in the Imperial Andes: A Collection of Transhistorical Studies

Kennedy, Sarah A., Norman, Scotti M.·2019·International Journal of Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/s10761-018-0491-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The papers in this special issue arise from the Status and Identity in the Imperial Andes session held at the 2017 meeting of the Society for American Archaeology in Vancouver, Canada. That session focused on the role of status and power in shaping colonial interactions and identities throughout the Andes during the fifteenth to seventeenth century CE. The papers in this issue examine how Inka and colonial period individuals (indigenous, African, Iberian, mestizo, etc.) selectively incorporated or rejected Imperial goods, and how differing levels of access to these goods may have influenced social status, health, and relationships with imperial actors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10761-018-0491-0

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Appadurai, A. (1991). Global ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In Fox, R. G. ed., Interventions: Anthropologies of the Present. School of American Research, Santa Fe, pp. 191–210.
  2. Dietler, M. (2005). The archaeology of colonization and the colonization of archaeology: theoretical challenges from an ancient Mediterranean colonial encounter. In Stein, G. J. ed., The Archaeology of Colonization and the Colonization of Archaeology. School for American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp. 33–68.
  3. Stein, G. J. ed. (2005). The Archaeology of Colonization and the Colonization of Archaeology. School for American Research Press, Santa Fe.
  4. Weaver, B. J. (2015). Fruit of the Vine, Work of Human Hands: An Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Slavery on the Jesuit Wine Haciendas of Nasca, Peru. Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, S. A., & Norman, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Sarah A.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-01-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
807-815
ISSN
  • 1092-7697 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7748
DOI
10.1007/s10761-018-0491-0
OpenAlex
W2907367989
Cited by
2
References
48
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
International Journal of Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
status and identity, colonial Andes, Inca Empire, colonialism, social status, power, material culture, indigenous identity, mestizos, Africans, 15th-17th centuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review