CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A phenomenology of landscape: A crisis in British landscape archaeology?

Barrett, John C., Ko, Ilhong·2009·Journal of Social Archaeology
DOI 10.1177/1469605309338422
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent criticism of the accuracy of the claimed observations on monument location by workers employing a ‘phenomenological’ approach to landscape archaeology in Britain has exposed failures in the way their particular approach has been employed to explain the choices made in the siting of certain Neolithic monuments. This article explains why such errors of record may have occurred and re-examines the ways in which the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger can offer a more positive contribution to our understanding of the historical context of the creation of these monuments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605309338422

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are two ways of perceiving the world: present-at-hand and ready-to-hand.

    “According to Barrett & Ko (2009: 282) there are two ways of perceiving the world. One way is to regard the world as that which is experienced by a subject who is consciously aware of his or her surroundings; as an object of inspection. This type of attitude is known as present-at-hand (vorhanden) in Heideggerian phenomenology. The other way is to regard the world as that which is approached simply”

    From ‘Benefit Maximizing Routes’: Development and Evaluation Using the Historical Roads of Korea’s Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910) (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett & Ko (2009)

  • For the ready-to-hand way of Being, movement throughout the landscape involves encounters with meaningful elements in the landscape as they 'just exist', and through these encounters possible understandings or categorizations of the landscape may come to be recognized.

    “For the latter way of Being, movement throughout the landscape, although initiated with a specific destination in mind, also involves encounters with meaningful elements in the landscape as they ‘just exist’; it is through these encounters that the possible understandings or categorizations of the landscape (such as that according to hillslope position) may come to be recognized.”

    From ‘Benefit Maximizing Routes’: Development and Evaluation Using the Historical Roads of Korea’s Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910) (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett & Ko (2009)

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Barrett, J.C., 1994, Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200BC
  2. Barrett, J.C., 1997, Analecta Praehistorica Liedensia, 29, 121
  3. Barrett, J.C. ( 2006) ‘A Perspective on the Early Architecture of Western Europe’, in J. Maran , C. Juwig, H. Schwengel and U. Thaler (eds) Constructing Power: Architecture, Ideology and Social Practice, pp. 15-30. Hamburg : Lit Verlag.
  4. 2007, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 17, 1
  5. Bradley, R., 1998, The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe
  6. Britnell, W.J., 1984, Gwernvale and Penywyrlod: Two Neolithic Long Cairns in the Black Mountains of Brecknock. Cambrian Archaeological Monograph 2
  7. 10.1017/S1380203805001583 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0003598X00040448 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0079497X0000147X · DOI
  10. Cummings, V., 2004, Places of Special Virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic Landscapes of Wales
  11. 10.1017/S0959774302000033 · DOI
  12. Dennett, D.C., 1995, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
  13. Dreyfus, H.L., 1991, Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1
  14. Edmonds, M., 1999, Ancestral Geographies of the Neolithic: Landscape, Monuments and Memory
  15. Edmonds, M., 2004, The Langdales: Landscape and Prehistory in a Lakeland Valley
  16. Edmonds, M., 2001, Prehistory in the Peak
  17. 10.1111/1468-0092.00074 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0003598X00115042 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0959774306000163 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/1467-9655.t01-3-00001 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0079497X00001146 · DOI
  22. Frede, D. ( 2006) ‘The Question of Being: Heidegger’s Project’ , in C.B. Guignon (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd edn, pp. 42-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  23. 10.1017/CBO9780511618598 · DOI
  24. Guignon, C.B., 1983, Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge
  25. 10.1017/CCOL0521821363.001 · DOI
  26. Heidegger, M., 1962, Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson
  27. Heidegger, M., 1968, What is Called Thinking?, trans. J. Glenn Gray
  28. 10.1017/CBO9780511558252 · DOI
  29. Husserl, E., 1972, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. W.R. Boyce Gibson
  30. McFadyen, L., 2006, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 21, 117
  31. McFadyen, L. ( 2007) ‘Making Architecture’, in D. Benson and A. Whittle (eds) Building Memories: The Neolithic Cotswold Long Barrow at Ascott-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire, pp. 348-54. Oxford : Oxbow Books.
  32. Merleau-Ponty, M., 1962, The Phenomonology of Perception, trans. C. Smith
  33. Muller, J. ( 1991) ‘The New Holy Family: A Polemic on Bourgeois Idealism in Archaeology’, in R.W. Preucel (ed.) Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, pp. 251-61. Occasional Paper No. 10. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Center for Archaeological Investigations .
  34. Richards, C., 2005, Dwelling among the Monuments: The Neolithic Village of Barnhouse, Maeshowe Passage Grave and Surrounding Monuments at Stenness, Orkney
  35. Saville, A., 1990, Hazleton North Gloucestershire, 1979-82: The Excavation of a Neolithic Long Cairn of the Cotswold-Severn Group
  36. Shanks, M., 1987, Re-constructing Archaeology
  37. 10.1111/j.1468-0092.1995.tb00062.x · DOI
  38. Smith, B. and D.W. Smith ( 1995) ‘Introduction’, in B. Smith and D. W. Smith (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, pp. 1-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  39. Smith, G.B., 2007, Martin Heidegger: Paths Taken, Paths Opened
  40. Steiner, G., 1989, Martin Heidegger
  41. Thomas, J., 1999, Understanding the Neolithic
  42. Tilley, C., 1994, A Phenomenology of Landscape
  43. Tilley, C., 1996, An Ethnography of the Neolithic: Early Prehistoric Societies in Southern Scandinavia
  44. Tilley, C. ( 2005) ‘Phenomenological Archaeology’, in C. Renfrew and P. Bahn (eds) Archaeology: The Key Concepts, pp. 201-7. London : Routledge.
  45. Tilley, C., 2007, Proceedings of the British Academy, 144, 329

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, J. C., & Ko, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK,
  • Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University, South Korea,
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-09-23
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
275-294
ISSN
  • 1469-6053
  • 1741-2951
DOI
10.1177/1469605309338422
Cited by
80
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review