CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changing how archaeology is done in Native American contexts: An Ndee (Apache) case study

Laluk, Nicholas C·2021·Journal of Social Archaeology
DOI 10.1177/1469605320945469
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The White Mountain Apache Tribe Cultural Heritage Resource Best Management Practices (WMATCHRBMPs) present and delineate in guideline form cultural heritage resource definitions, management, and necessary steps before, during, and after project implementation for any ground-disturbing projects potentially adversely affecting cultural heritage resources on Ndee (Apache) trust lands. However, since the tribe’s adoption of the practices, the application of Ndee tenets found within the guidelines to real-world cultural and archaeological methods and practices remains scant. Embedded in the Ndee cultural tenets is the tenet of “respect,” which I will argue can be used as a tool by non- Ndee researchers to critically reflect on their own research agendas and to guide research projects with Ndee communities. By foregrounding respect within various ongoing archaeological project-related occurrences, contemporary Ndee experiences, defining Ndee material trait lists, superiority statements, archaeological categorizations, and stereotypical underpinnings, better paths forward for collaborative research with Ndee and other Native American communities can be highlighted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605320945469

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, much of this work has been conducted by scholars operating within Indigenous Archaeology, who have advocated for the integration of Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies into interpretative archaeological practice.

    “To date, much of this work has been conducted by scholars operating within Indigenous Archaeology, who have advocated for the integration of Indigenous ontologies and epistemologies into interpretative archaeological practice (Todd 2016;Cipolla et al. 2019;Laluk 2020;Acebo 2021;Montgomery 2021;Two Bears 2021).”

    From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Laluk 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Anyon R, Ferguson TJ, Jackson L, et al. (1997) Native American oral tradition and archaeology: Issues of structure, relevance, and respect. In: Swidler N, Dongoske KE, Anyon R, et al. (eds) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground . Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, pp. 77–87.
  2. Atalay S (2008a) Multivocality and indigenous archaeologies. In: Habu J, Matsunaga JM and Fawcett C (eds) Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies . New York: Springer, pp. 29–44. · DOI
  3. Atalay S (2008b) Pedagogy of decolonization: Advancing archaeological practice through education. In: Silliman SW (ed) Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology . Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, pp. 123–144. · DOI
  4. Atalay, 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects
  5. 10.1353/aiq.2003.0031 · DOI
  6. Basso KH, 1996, Wisdom Sits in Places
  7. Cajete G, 2004, American Indian Thought: Philosophical Essays, 45
  8. 10.1111/j.1556-3502.2010.51307.x · DOI
  9. 10.1525/mua.2007.30.2.101 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s41636-018-0128-5 · DOI
  11. Cusick JG, 1998, Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change, and Archaeology, 126
  12. Deloria V, 1969, Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto
  13. 10.1177/1469605303003001101 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/j.2161-007X.2012.00003.x · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.63 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S000273160000398X · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/00141844.2016.1171791 · DOI
  18. Krmpotich C, 2012, Anthropologists, Indigenous Scholars, and the Research Endeavour: Seeking Bridges towards Mutual Respect, 162
  19. Kuwanwisiwma LJ, 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 151
  20. 10.1177/1469605317690082 · DOI
  21. 10.1525/aa.1992.94.4.02a00030 · DOI
  22. Mihesuah DA, 1996, American Indians: Stereotypes and Realities
  23. 10.1353/aiq.2006.0031 · DOI
  24. Nicholas GP, 1997, At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, 1
  25. 10.7183/0002-7316.78.1.105 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Preucel R, 2008, Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, 129
  27. Reid JJ, 2005, Thirty Years into Yesterday: A History of Archaeology at Grasshopper Pueblo
  28. 10.1017/S0002731600048575 · DOI
  29. Smith C, 2005, Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Archaeological Theory and Practice
  30. Teague LS, 2007, Human Remains: Guide for Museums and Academic Institutions, 245
  31. 10.2307/280140 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Watt E, 2004, Don’t Let the Sun Step over You: A White Mountain Apache Family Life, 1860–1975
  33. 10.2307/1185589 · DOI
  34. Welch JR (2000) The White Mountain Apache Tribe Heritage Program: Origins, operations, and challenges. In: Dongoske KE, Aldenderfer M and Doehner K (eds) Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists . Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, pp. 67–83.
  35. Welch, 2004, White Mountain Apache Tribe cultural heritage resource best management practices
  36. 10.1177/2158244017747016 · DOI
  37. Welch JR (2018) Sovereignty-driven research. In: Herman RDK (ed) Giving Back: Research and Reciprocity in Indigenous Settings . Oregon State University Press, pp. 264 -282.
  38. 10.1179/175355210X12670102063706 · DOI
  39. 10.1353/wic.0.0057 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/1469605307077477 · DOI
  41. 10.1353/aiq.2001.0015 · DOI
  42. 10.17953/aicr.33.4.2866316711817855 · DOI
  43. Williams SL (2012) Smudging the book: The role of cultural authority in tribal historical narratives and revitalization at Rocky Boy . PhD Thesis, University of Iowa, USA.
  44. Wilson S, 2008, Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laluk, N. C.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2020-07-27
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
53-73
ISSN
  • 1469-6053
  • 1741-2951
DOI
10.1177/1469605320945469
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review