The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys
Abstract
Increasingly, web surveys are being used to supplement telephone survey data and some predict internet methods will one day replace telephone interviews as the primary method for surveying general populations. Despite these trends, few studies have systematically compared response differences between the two methods. This article describes a study in which both telephone and web surveys were used to collect data on the corporate reputation of an international firm. Findings reveal significant differences in sample characteristics, response effects and overall costs. In addition to demographic differences, the web garnered a lower response rate, more item omissions, and produced more negative or neutral evaluations than did the telephone survey. Factor structure for the corporate reputation construct was simpler in the web-based data. Predictability of behavioural measures was essentially equivalent between the two modes; however, cost-per-contact was significantly lower in the web survey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Cited by
Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels
Prepared for the AAPOR Executive Council by a Task Force operating under the auspices of the AAPOR Standards Committee, W. M. I., Baker, R., Blumberg, S. J., Brick, J. M., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennis, J. M., Dillman, D., Frankel, M. R., Garland, P., et al. (2010) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfq048 · Cited by 584
The role of urban green space for human well-being
Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013 · Cited by 503
A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys
Braunsberger, K., Wybenga, H., & Gates, R. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.015 · Cited by 222
A comprehensive model of perceived risk of e-commerce transactions
Glover, S., & Benbasat, I. (2010) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415150202 · Cited by 196
A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups, and e-Delphi
(2009) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/s1470785309200608 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Roster, C. A., Rogers, R. D., Albaum, G., & Klein, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Market Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-373
- ISSN
- 1470-7853 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2173
- OpenAlex
- W2166073427
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/147078530404600301
- The paper
- Roster, C. A., Rogers, R. D., Albaum, G., & Klein, D. (2004). A Comparison of Response Characteristics from Web and Telephone Surveys. International Journal of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530404600301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.