Cited by 23Ethics in Clinical ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Recruitment challenges and strategies: Lessons learned from an early-stage dyadic intervention (innovative practice)

Szabo, Sarah M, Whitlatch, Carol J, Orsulic-Jeras, Silvia, Johnson, Justin D·2018·Dementia

Abstract

An increasing number of family caregivers are seeking services and support due in large part to the dramatic increase in the number of older adults obtaining dementia diagnoses. This paper describes barriers and challenges experienced by our research team in recruiting early-stage dementia caregiving dyads into research studies. Effective recruitment and screening strategies to address these barriers are also discussed. Recruitment and enrollment success depends on these strategies as well as having well-trained recruitment staff who are knowledgeable about the study and have experience working with older adults, and more specifically, persons with dementia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301216659608

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szabo, S. M., Whitlatch, C. J., Orsulic-Jeras, S., & Johnson, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging (US)
  • Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, Cleveland, OH, USA
Corresponding author
Szabo, Sarah M
Venue
Dementia
Published
2016-07-12
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
621-626
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2466543096
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
participant recruitment, family caregivers, early-stage dementia, recruitment barriers, screening method, older adults, dyadic intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Geriatrics, Humans, Caregivers, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review