Cited by 82Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

The SHARE program for dementia: Implementation of an early-stage dyadic care-planning intervention.

Orsulic-Jeras, Silvia, Whitlatch, Carol J, Szabo, Sarah M, Shelton, Evan G, Johnson, Justin·2019·Dementia

Abstract

This article describes the implementation of SHARE (Support, Health, Activities, Resources, and Education), a counseling-based care-planning intervention for persons living with early-stage dementia and their family caregivers (CGs). The foundation of SHARE is built upon assessing and documenting the person living with dementia's care values and preferences for future care. Using the SHARE approach, CGs are given an opportunity to achieve an understanding of their loved one's desires before the onset of disease progression when the demand for making care decisions is high. Through working together with a SHARE Counselor, the care dyad begins to identify other sources of support, such as family and friends and service providers, in order to build a more balanced and realistic plan of care for the future. Data were collected from 40 early-stage dementia care dyads to determine the acceptability of having structured discussions about future care in the early stages of dementia. Findings from this study demonstrate the importance of planning in the early stages when persons with dementia can voice their care values and preferences for future care. Finally, this paper illustrates the use of supportive strategies such as rapport building, establishing buy-in, and communication to initiate care-related discussions with care dyads in the early stages that will help lead to more effective decision making in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1471301216673455

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orsulic-Jeras, S., Whitlatch, C. J., Szabo, S. M., Shelton, E. G., & Johnson, J.
Affiliations
  • Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging (US)
  • Cleveland State University (US)
Venue
Dementia
Published
2016-10-13
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
360-379
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W2531374535
Cited by
82
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Administration for Community Living
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
early-stage dementia, family caregivers, counseling intervention, care preferences, care values, future care planning, implementation, acceptability, caregiver support, care decision-making, rapport building
MeSH terms
Aged, Counseling, Decision Making, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Rehabilitation, Program Evaluation, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review