Cited by 68Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Narrative reconstruction and post-traumatic growth among trauma survivors: The importance of narrative in social work research and practice

Jirek, Sarah L·2017·Qualitative Social Work

Abstract

A substantial body of theoretical work on meaning-making processes postulates that assisting clients in reconstructing their personal narratives in the aftermath of trauma helps survivors to integrate the traumatic experience into their identities and life stories. However, the relationship between trauma survivors’ (re-)construction of a coherent life narrative and their development of post-traumatic growth (PTG) has rarely been explored. In this study, I conducted life story interviews with 46 university students with trauma histories to examine: (1) How, and to what degree, trauma survivors (re-)construct a coherent life narrative; and (2) If and how this process is connected to the development of PTG. I found that survivors who were able to articulate a coherent story about their lives experienced more PTG, and I identified key characteristics of three stages of post-trauma change. I also found that trauma-related therapy, writing, informal conversations, and self-reflection played important roles in the narrative reconstruction process. I argue that some narratives are easier to reconstruct than others because not all narratives are equally valued in society. The presence or absence of narratives in the discursive environment, the reception these stories receive within society, and the access that individuals have to these narratives are influenced by the historical moment, social norms, politics, power, privilege, and individuals’ social locations. To promote empowermen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1473325016656046

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Howard GS, 1989, A Tale of Two Stories: Excursions into a Narrative Psychology
  2. McAdams DP, 1993, The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self
  3. Neimeyer RA (Ed.) (2001a) Meaning Reconstruction and the Experience of Loss . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  4. O’Leary VE, 1995, Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1, 121
  5. Pennebaker JW, 1997, Opening up: The Healing Power of Emotional Expression
  6. Sewell KW, 1997, Advances in Personal Construct Psychology, 4, 207

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jirek, S. L.
Affiliations
Westmont College (US)
Corresponding author
Jirek, Sarah L
Venue
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
166-188
ISSN
  • 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3117
OpenAlex
W2469236510
Cited by
68
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
narrative reconstruction, posttraumatic growth, trauma survivors, life stories, meaning-making, social work practice, social justice, empowerment, trauma treatment, writing, self-reflection, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review