Cited by 12Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Answer First or Google First? Using the Internet in ways that Enhance, not Impair, One’s Subsequent Retention of Needed Information

Giebl, Saskia, Mena, Stefany, Storm, Benjamin C., Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon, Bjork, Robert A.·2021·Psychology Learning & Teaching

Abstract

Technological advances have given us tools—Google, in particular—that can both augment and free up our cognitive resources. Research has demonstrated, however, that some cognitive costs may arise from our reliance on such external memories. We examined whether pretesting—asking participants to solve a problem before consulting Google for needed information—can enhance participants’ subsequent recall for the searched-for content as well as for relevant information previously studied. Two groups of participants, one with no programming knowledge and one with some programming knowledge, learned several fundamental programming concepts in the context of a problem-solving task. On a later multiple-choice test with transfer questions, participants who attempted the task before consulting Google for help out-performed participants who were allowed to search Google right away. The benefit of attempting to solve the problem before googling appeared larger with some degree of programming experience, consistent with the notion that some prior knowledge can help learners integrate new information in ways that benefit its learning as well as that of previously studied related information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1475725720961593

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generating answers before consulting external resources yields superior recall compared with immediate lookup.

    “Research on 'thinkbefore-search' paradigms shows that generating answers before consulting external resources yields superior recall compared with immediate lookup [5, 6], underscoring the importance of preserving productive struggle.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giebl, S., Mena, S., Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, USA
Corresponding author
Giebl, Saskia
Venue
Psychology Learning & Teaching
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
58-75
ISSN
  • 1475-7257 (ISSN-L)
  • 2057-3022
OpenAlex
W3093772357
Cited by
12
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Learning & Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
Google, external memory, pretesting, problem solving, memory retrieval, prior knowledge, programming learning, transfer of learning, information search, cognitive load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review