Cited by 362Memory Processes and InfluencesStudent Assessment and FeedbackVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement.

McDaniel, Mark A., Agarwal, Pooja K., Huelser, Barbie J., McDermott, Kathleen B., Roediger, Henry L.·2011·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Typically, teachers use tests to evaluate students ’ knowledge acquisition. In a novel experimental study, we examined whether low-stakes testing (quizzing) can be used to foster students ’ learning of course content in 8th grade science classes. Students received multiple-choice quizzes (with feedback); in the quizzes, some target content that would be included on the class summative assessments was tested, and some of the target content was not tested. In Experiment 1, three quizzes on the content were spaced across the coverage of a unit. Quizzing produced significant learning benefits, with between 13% and 25 % gains in performance on summative unit examinations. In Experiments 2a and 2b, we manipulated the placement of the quizzing, with students being quizzed on some content prior to the lecture, quizzed on some immediately after the lecture, and quizzed on some as a review prior to the unit exam. Review quizzing produced the greatest increases in exam performance, and these increases were only slightly augmented when the items had appeared on previous quizzes. The benefits of quizzing (relative to not quizzing) persisted on cumulative semester and end-of-year exams. We suggest that the present effects reflect benefits accruing to retrieval practice, benefits that are well established in the basic literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021782

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Core classroom content can be better remembered on unit exams after low-stakes multiple-choice quizzing with immediate correct-answer feedback.

    “In other studies, we have also repeatedly demonstrated that core classroom content can be better remembered on unit exams after lowstakes multiple-choice quizzing with immediate correct-answer feedback (McDaniel et al. 2007(McDaniel et al. , 2011(McDaniel et al. , 2013;;Roediger et al. 2011a).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as McDaniel et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2011-05
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
399-414
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2155589898
Cited by
360
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Education (R305H060080-06)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
retrieval practice, low-stakes assessment, quizzing, 8th grade science, junior high school science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review