The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research
Open accessAbstract
In this essay, we discuss how tables can be used to ensure—and reassure about—trustworthiness in qualitative research. We posit that in qualitative research, tables help not only increase transparency about data collection, analysis, and findings, but also—and no less importantly—organize and analyze data effectively. We present some of the tables most frequently used by qualitative researchers, explain their uses, discuss how they enhance trustworthiness, and provide illustrative examples to inspire readers in their use of tables in their own research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,626
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (1988) · Cited by 20,701
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,614
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J., Gurdon, M., Jick, T., Petit, A., Stern, R., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,945
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
(2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,828
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods
Lotto, L. S., Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1986) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1163741 · Cited by 10,315
(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n168 · Cited by 8,276
Cited by
Trustworthiness in qualitative research
Adler, R. H. (2022) · Journal of Human Lactation · doi:10.1177/08903344221116620 · Cited by 597
Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Singh Ghura, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048 · Cited by 443
The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education?
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.01185 · Cited by 387
Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D.
- Venue
- Strategic Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-12-21
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 1476-1270 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-315X
- OpenAlex
- W3114017769
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 36.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1476127020979329
- The paper
- Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2021). Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020979329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.