The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education?
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Paper page
Abstract
This paper explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, the study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believe AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argue that human teachers possess unique qualities, such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. The study also emphasizes the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, which AI technologies cannot currently replicate. The research proposes that teachers can effectively integrate AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as a replacement. To do so, teachers need to understand how AI can work well with teachers and students while avoiding potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues such as data protection, ethics, and privacy. The study reveals that students value and respect human teachers, even as AI becomes more prevalent in education. The study also introduces a roadmap for students, teachers, and universities. This roadmap serves as a valuable guide for refining teaching skills, fostering personal connections, and designing curriculums that effectively balance the strengths of human educators with AI technologies. The future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and AI. By understanding and refining their unique qualities, teachers, students, and universities can effectively navigate the integration of AI, ensuring a well-rounded and impactful learning experience.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent developments in GenAI technologies renew debates about AI replacing teachers, with financial pressures on universities fuelling the discourse.
“Recent developments in GenAI technologies renew these debates, with financial pressures on universities fuelling the discourse (Chan & Tsi, 2023;Devlin, 2023).”
From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Chan & Tsi, 2023
The Introduction (page not provided) says ChatGPT’s launch and growing AI capabilities have made the question of replacing teachers more pressing. The passages do not attribute that debate to financial pressures on universities; a search for financial and budget pressures found no support for that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudents still have a strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones because they believe human teachers possess unique characteristics that machines cannot replicate.
“However, according to one of our recent studies (Chan & Tsi, 2023), students still have a strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones as they believe that human teachers possess unique characteristics that machines cannot replicate.”
From Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect (2024) · cites this paper as Chan & Tsi, 2023
The Discussion (page unavailable) says most participants viewed teachers as irreplaceable because of unique human qualities, and reports a student saying AI cannot replicate creativity and emotion. The Quantitative Data Findings (page unavailable) show that students did not strongly believe AI would replace teachers, but do not establish the claimed strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Blikstein, P. (2016). Using learning analytics to assess students' behavior in open-ended programming tasks. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 8(1), 1-27.
- Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y · DOI · Paper page
- Chan, C.K.Y., Fong, E.T.Y., Luk, L.Y.Y., & Ho, R. (2017). A review of literature on challenges in the development and implementation of generic competencies in higher education curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 57, 1-10.
- Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 · DOI · Paper page
- Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. & Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1229- 1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732 · DOI · Paper page
- Felix, C. V. (2020). The Role of the Teacher and AI in Education. In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger & M. Makhanya (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Role of Technology in Humanizing Higher Education (Vol. 33, pp. 33-48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055- 364120200000033003 · DOI
- Goksel, N. & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Current Insights and Future Perspectives. In S. Sisman-Ugur & G. Kurubacak (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp.224-236). IGI Global.
- Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Taylor & Francis.
- Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069-6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils' educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers and Education, 157(November), 103970-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970 · DOI
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
- Malik, G., Tayal, D. K., & Vij, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Teaching. In P. K. Sa, S. Bakshi, I. K. Hatzilygeroudis & M. N. Sahoo (Eds.), Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques (pp. 407-417). Springer Singapore Pte. Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8639-7_42 · DOI
- Morris, M. R. (2023). Scientists' Perspectives on the Potential for Generative AI in their Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01420. · arXiv
- Nwana, H. S. (1990). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: an overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4, 251- 277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168958 · DOI · Paper page
- Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 107769582211495-. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577 · DOI · Paper page
- Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025 · DOI · Paper page
- Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22- 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Renz, A., Krishnaraja, S., & Gronau, E. (2020). Demystification of Artificial Intelligence in Education -How much AI is really in the Educational Technology? International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 2(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i1.12675 · DOI
- Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society, 36(1), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Siemens, G., & Baker, R. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252-254.
- Terzopoulos, G., & Satratzemi, M. (2019). Voice Assistants and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Proceedings of the 9th Balkan Conference on Informatics, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351556.3351588 · DOI
- Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting Artificial Intelligence in Education Out of the Box : Educational Cobots and Smart Classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y UNESCO (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. France, UNESCO. · DOI
- Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 114-.
- Wogu, I. A. P., Misra, S., Olu-Owolabi, E. F., Assibong, P. A. & Udoh, O. D. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Teachers and the Fate of Learners in the 21 st Century Education Sector: Implications for Theory and Practice. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(16), 2245-2259.
- Yang, J., & Zhang, B. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Tutoring Robots: A Systematic Review and Design Guidelines. Applied Sciences, 9(10), 2078-. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102078 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · Cited by 2,301 · see citing works
Self-citationA comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 · Cited by 1,577 · see citing works
Self-citationNew Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution
Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151612451 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Walter, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
The Robots Are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Education
Prather, J., Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Becker, B. A., Albluwi, I., Craig, M., Keuning, H., Kiesler, N., Kohn, T., Luxton-Reilly, A., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3623762.3633499 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Yu, H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
RetractedGenerative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781003459026 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationHigher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania
Rudolph, J., Mohamed Ismail, F. M., & Popenici, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/54fs5e77 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Integration: Pedagogical Strategies and Policies at Leading Universities
Alqahtani, N., & Wafula, Z. (2025) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09749-x · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Henadirage, A., & Gunarathne, N. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00439-5 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
AI in Education: Shaping the Future of Teaching and Learning
Takona, J. (2024) · International Journal of Current Educational Studies · doi:10.46328/ijces.121 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Soleimani, S., Farrokhnia, M., van Dijk, A., & Noroozi, O. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2530767 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Alshamy, A. S., Al-Harthi, A. S. A., & Abdullah, S. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets) · doi:10.1109/smartnets65254.2025.11106833 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
From AI Literacy to AI Fluency: A Developmental Framework for Higher Education
Zentner, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7014818
- Authors
- Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk
- ORCID
- Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 101395-101395
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2305.01185
- OpenAlex
- W4401988281
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 152 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 21
- FWCI
- 137.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- University Grants Committee
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- generative AI, teacher role, human-AI collaboration, AI replacing teachers, student perceptions, teacher perceptions, socioemotional skills, critical thinking, AI literacy, AI ethics, privacy, university teaching, Hong Kong universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review