PreprintCited by 387Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology and Pedagogy

The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education?

Open access
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk, Tsi, Louisa H. Y.·2023·arXiv

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Paper page

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, specifically its capacity to replace or assist human teachers. By reviewing relevant literature and analysing survey data from students and teachers, the study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of advancing AI technologies. Findings suggest that although some believe AI may eventually replace teachers, the majority of participants argue that human teachers possess unique qualities, such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotions, which make them irreplaceable. The study also emphasizes the importance of social-emotional competencies developed through human interactions, which AI technologies cannot currently replicate. The research proposes that teachers can effectively integrate AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as a replacement. To do so, teachers need to understand how AI can work well with teachers and students while avoiding potential pitfalls, develop AI literacy, and address practical issues such as data protection, ethics, and privacy. The study reveals that students value and respect human teachers, even as AI becomes more prevalent in education. The study also introduces a roadmap for students, teachers, and universities. This roadmap serves as a valuable guide for refining teaching skills, fostering personal connections, and designing curriculums that effectively balance the strengths of human educators with AI technologies. The future of education lies in the synergy between human teachers and AI. By understanding and refining their unique qualities, teachers, students, and universities can effectively navigate the integration of AI, ensuring a well-rounded and impactful learning experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2305.01185

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments in GenAI technologies renew debates about AI replacing teachers, with financial pressures on universities fuelling the discourse.

    “Recent developments in GenAI technologies renew these debates, with financial pressures on universities fuelling the discourse (Chan & Tsi, 2023;Devlin, 2023).”

    From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Chan & Tsi, 2023

    The Introduction (page not provided) says ChatGPT’s launch and growing AI capabilities have made the question of replacing teachers more pressing. The passages do not attribute that debate to financial pressures on universities; a search for financial and budget pressures found no support for that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Students still have a strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones because they believe human teachers possess unique characteristics that machines cannot replicate.

    “However, according to one of our recent studies (Chan & Tsi, 2023), students still have a strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones as they believe that human teachers possess unique characteristics that machines cannot replicate.”

    From Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect (2024) · cites this paper as Chan & Tsi, 2023

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says most participants viewed teachers as irreplaceable because of unique human qualities, and reports a student saying AI cannot replicate creativity and emotion. The Quantitative Data Findings (page unavailable) show that students did not strongly believe AI would replace teachers, but do not establish the claimed strong preference for human teachers over artificial ones. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Blikstein, P. (2016). Using learning analytics to assess students' behavior in open-ended programming tasks. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 8(1), 1-27.
  2. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chan, C.K.Y., Fong, E.T.Y., Luk, L.Y.Y., & Ho, R. (2017). A review of literature on challenges in the development and implementation of generic competencies in higher education curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 57, 1-10.
  4. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. & Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1229- 1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Felix, C. V. (2020). The Role of the Teacher and AI in Education. In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger & M. Makhanya (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Role of Technology in Humanizing Higher Education (Vol. 33, pp. 33-48). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055- 364120200000033003 · DOI
  8. Goksel, N. & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Current Insights and Future Perspectives. In S. Sisman-Ugur & G. Kurubacak (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp.224-236). IGI Global.
  9. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  10. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Taylor & Francis.
  11. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069-6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils' educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers and Education, 157(November), 103970-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970 · DOI
  15. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
  16. Malik, G., Tayal, D. K., & Vij, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Teaching. In P. K. Sa, S. Bakshi, I. K. Hatzilygeroudis & M. N. Sahoo (Eds.), Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques (pp. 407-417). Springer Singapore Pte. Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8639-7_42 · DOI
  17. Morris, M. R. (2023). Scientists' Perspectives on the Potential for Generative AI in their Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01420. · arXiv
  18. Nwana, H. S. (1990). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: an overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4, 251- 277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168958 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 107769582211495-. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22- 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Renz, A., Krishnaraja, S., & Gronau, E. (2020). Demystification of Artificial Intelligence in Education -How much AI is really in the Educational Technology? International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 2(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i1.12675 · DOI
  23. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society, 36(1), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Siemens, G., & Baker, R. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252-254.
  26. Terzopoulos, G., & Satratzemi, M. (2019). Voice Assistants and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Proceedings of the 9th Balkan Conference on Informatics, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351556.3351588 · DOI
  27. Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting Artificial Intelligence in Education Out of the Box : Educational Cobots and Smart Classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y UNESCO (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. France, UNESCO. · DOI
  28. Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 114-.
  29. Wogu, I. A. P., Misra, S., Olu-Owolabi, E. F., Assibong, P. A. & Udoh, O. D. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Teachers and the Fate of Learners in the 21 st Century Education Sector: Implications for Theory and Practice. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(16), 2245-2259.
  30. Yang, J., & Zhang, B. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Tutoring Robots: A Systematic Review and Design Guidelines. Applied Sciences, 9(10), 2078-. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102078 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
83
Pages
101395-101395
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401988281
Cited by
387
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 152 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 21
FWCI
137.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
University Grants Committee
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
generative AI, teacher role, human-AI collaboration, AI replacing teachers, student perceptions, teacher perceptions, socioemotional skills, critical thinking, AI literacy, AI ethics, privacy, university teaching, Hong Kong universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review