CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Higher Education Research StudiesMentoring and Academic DevelopmentEducational Outcomes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student Characteristics and Collegiate Environments that Contribute to the Overall Satisfaction With Academic Advising Among College Students

DeLaRosby, Hal R.·2017·Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
DOI 10.1177/1521025115611618
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Academic advising satisfaction is highly correlated with retention in higher education. Thriving Quotient survey responses were collected from undergraduate students at a private, liberal arts college in the Pacific Northwest. Using a multiple regression analysis, this study examined what student characteristics and collegiate environments affect student satisfaction with academic advising. The results indicate that campus residency, amount of time spent in student–faculty interaction, and the quality of student–faculty interaction are statistically significant factors in academic advising satisfaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1521025115611618

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Afshar T. A. (2009) Student perception and challenges facing academic advising. Journal of College Teaching & Learning 6: 61–68. Retrieved from http://www.cluteinstitute.com/.
  2. Afshar T., Dhiman S. (2008) Assessment of the excellence of academic advising: Lessons learned. Journal of College Teaching & Learning 5: 51–60. Retrieved from http://www.cluteinstitute.com/.
  3. 10.1353/csd.0.0033 · DOI
  4. Astin A. W. (1999) Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development 40: 518–529. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/.
  5. 10.1002/he.10805 · DOI
  6. 10.2190/CS.10.3.g · DOI
  7. 10.2190/CS.9.3.b · DOI
  8. Creamer D. G. (2000) Associates Use of theory in academic advising. In: Gordon V. N., Wesley R. H. (eds) Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 18–34.
  9. Creswell J. W. (2012) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  10. DeBerard M. S., Spielmans G. I., Julka D. C. (2004) Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal 38: 66–80. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj_2006.html.
  11. 10.1002/abc.20062 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Habley W. R. (2003) Faculty advising: Practice and promise. In: Kramer G. L. (ed.) Faculty advising examined: Enhancing the potential of college faculty as advisors, Boston, MA: Anker, pp. 23–29.
  13. Hale M. D., Graham D. L., Johnson D. M. (2009) Are students more satisfied with academic advising when there is a congruence between current and preferred advising styles? College Student Journal 43: 313–324. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/csj_2006.html.
  14. 10.2190/G5K7-3529-4X22-8236 · DOI
  15. 10.55016/ojs/ajer.v47i4.54890 · DOI
  16. Kuh G. D. (2008) Advising for student success. In: Gordon V. N., Habley W. R., Grites T. J. (eds) Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 68–84.
  17. Lau L. K. (2003) Institutional factors affecting student retention. Education 124: 126–136. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com.
  18. 10.4159/9780674417502 · DOI
  19. Low L. (2000) Are college students satisfied? A national analysis of changing expectations, Indianapolis, IN: Lumina FoundationRetrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/.
  20. 10.12930/0271-9517-24.1-2.48 · DOI
  21. 10.12930/0271-9517-30.1.47 · DOI
  22. Nutt C. L. (2000) Associates One-to-one advising. In: Gordon V. N., Wesley R. H. (eds) Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 220–227.
  23. Olani A. (2009) Predicting first year university students’ academic success. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 7: 1053–1072. Retrieved from http://investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/index.php.
  24. Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. (2005) How college affects students. Vol. 2: A third decade of research, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  25. Roberts J. R., Styron R.Jr. (2010) Student satisfaction and persistence: Factors vital to student retention. Research in Higher Education Journal 6: 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/rhej.html.
  26. 10.1002/abc.20022 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/abc.20029 · DOI
  28. 10.12930/0271-9517-25.2.20 · DOI
  29. Self C. (2008) Associates Advising delivery: Professional advisors, counselors, and other staff. In: Gordon V. N., Habley W. R., Grites T. J. (eds) Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 267–278.
  30. Smith J. (2002). First-year student perceptions of academic advisement: A qualitative study and reality check. NACADA Journal 22(2) 39–49. Retrieved from https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Journal. · DOI
  31. Tinto V. (1987) Leaving college: Rethinking the cause and cures of student retention, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  32. 10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W · DOI · Paper page
  33. Upcraft M. L., Gardner J. N., Barefoot B. O. (2005) Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  34. Vowell F., Farren P. J. (2003) Expectations and training of faculty advisors. In: Kramer G. L. (ed.) Faculty advising examined: Enhancing the potential of college faculty as advisors, Boston, MA: Anker, pp. 23–29.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
DeLaRosby, H. R.
Affiliations
Pacific Lutheran University (US)
Corresponding author
DeLaRosby, Hal R.
Venue
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2015-10-19
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
145-160
ISSN
  • 1521-0251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4167
DOI
10.1177/1521025115611618
OpenAlex
W2399323007
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
academic advising, student satisfaction, student retention, student-faculty interaction, student characteristics, undergraduate students, liberal arts colleges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review