Effectiveness of Parent-Related Interventions on Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Given the high prevalence of cyberbullying and its negative physical and psychological effects on the development of adolescents, numerous studies have attempted its reduction by developing anti-cyberbullying interventions. In the present study, we investigated the effectiveness of parent-related programs in reducing the frequency of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents. A thorough search was carried out on seven electronic databases: EBSCO, ERIC, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Only quantitative studies that reported the effectiveness of parent-related programs in reducing the frequency of cyberbullying perpetration or victimization were included in the review. Eleven studies were finalized, and meta-analyses were performed using a random effect model on RevMan v5.4 software developed by Cochrane. Findings reveal that existing parent-related programs have very small effect sizes on cyberbullying perpetration (standardized mean differences [SMDs] = −0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.26, −0.09]) and victimization (SMD = −0.17, 95% CI [−0.24, −0.10]). The modes of parental involvement and intervention do not moderate the program effectiveness, but those with shorter durations are more effective than longer ones in reducing the frequency of cyberbullying victimization. Furthermore, findings indicate that interventions with a theoretical foundation are more effective than those without one. This review provides evidence to improve anti-cyberbullying interventions by effectively enabling parent involvement, as well as increasing parenting skills, parent–child interactions, and communication. Given the limited effectiveness of parent-related interventions, future research is needed to identify key moderators to improve such programs or to develop school–family patterns to reduce cyberbullying.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participation in cyberbullying intervention programmes has a small but significant effect in reducing victimization.
“Participation in cyberbullying intervention programmes has been consistently shown across 11 meta-analyses to have a small but significant effect in reducing victimization25,26,89–91,102,105,122,125,128.”
From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084 · see citing works
New Effect Size Rules of Thumb
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 · Cited by 3,254 · see citing works
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,566 · see citing works
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Selkie, E. M., Fales, J. L., & Moreno, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Chu, X.-W., Fan, C.-Y., Liu, Q.-Q., & Zhou, Z.-K. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.039 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.004 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Early Forms of Controlling Parenting and the Development of Childhood Anxiety
Laurin, J. C., Joussemet, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2015) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0131-9 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kasturiratna, K. T. A. S., Hartanto, A., Chen, C. H. Y., Tong, E. M. W., & Majeed, N. M. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02011-6 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, L., & Jiang, S.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Jiang, Shan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-12-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3678-3696
- ISSN
- 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8324
- OpenAlex
- W4310603437
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- national natural science foundation of china (72204216)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, parental involvement, parenting skills, parent-child communication, intervention effectiveness, school-family partnership, adolescents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review