Cited by 26Workplace Health and Well-beingBehavioral Health and InterventionsOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Worksite Health Promotion Program Participation: A Study to Examine the Determinants of Participation

Hall, Michael Edward, Bergman, Randall J., Nivens, Samantha·2014·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between organizational health climate and worksite health promotion program participation, specifically engaging individuals who are unlikely to make positive health behavior choices on their own. Participants consisted of employees at three separate furniture-manufacturing facilities completing a voluntary survey. Using responses (n = 349) from the health climate instrument, which is a measure of the collective attitudes, beliefs, and readiness to change a health behavior, this study identified two factors that were significant contributors to worksite health promotion program participation. Health norms, the collective attitudes regarding healthy lifestyle, as measured by the subscales-health scale and intention to make a behavior change-and "optimistic bias," the overassessment of one's personal health, were found to be predictors of participation. Additionally, significant (p < .05) predictors of self-assessed health, included perceived control to initiate, competence to carry out, and the organizational support of the health behavior change. The findings suggest that the organization's health norms and self-assessed health are associated with the worker's motivation to become involved with health promotion interventions. Offering worksite health screenings and advanced programming and creating a culture of health at work can help address program participation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1524839913510721

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, M. E., Bergman, R. J., & Nivens, S.
Affiliations
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
  • Lenoir–Rhyne University (US)
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2013-11-14
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
768-776
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W2020791503
Cited by
26
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
workplace health promotion, program participation, health norms, optimism bias, self-rated health, perceived control, organizational support, furniture workers, health behavior change, health screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Community Participation, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Industry, Male, Occupational Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review