The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the Replicating Effective Programs Framework to Adapt a Heart Health Intervention
Open accessAbstract
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. African Americans and people of low socioeconomic status suffer disproportionately from heart disease–related morbidity and mortality. In Detroit, Michigan, a primarily African American and low-income urban area, heart disease mortality is at twice the national rate. Despite evidence for the effectiveness of self-management support interventions in reducing chronic disease burden for older adults, few are adapted for communities most in need. This article describes the process of adapting Take PRIDE, an evidence-based heart disease self-management intervention, for older adults in Detroit via the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework. Working within a community–academic partnership, we found REP useful in facilitating the identification of diverse stakeholders, core versus adaptable elements of the intervention and barriers to implementation. We also made several modifications to the REP framework in order to better fit our project needs. Overall, we found REP to be an effective, flexible tool that allowed us to successfully adapt a disease-management intervention for this setting. Processes, lessons learned, and recommendations offered in this article may help researchers and practitioners working to expand access to self-management support for populations most affected by chronic disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other aspects of reporting that may be important for improving understanding of modification and its impact, such as when in the implementation process the modification was made, were also not included in the prior frameworks.
“Further, we recognized that other aspects of reporting that may be important for improving understanding of modification and its impact, such as when in the implementation process the modification was made, were also not included [28–31].”
From The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (2019) · cites this paper as [31]
The Background says adaptation processes are often poorly documented, and the Discussion (REP Framework: Limitations) says REP lacks explicit options for making certain modifications. Neither passage says prior frameworks omitted reporting when in implementation a modification was made; searches for that timing and reporting point found no such statement. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Blaha, M. J., Dai, S., Ford, E. S., Fox, C. S., Franco, S., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12 · Cited by 1,408
Kilbourne, A. M., Neumann, M. S., Pincus, H. A., Bauer, M. S., & Stall, R. (2007) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-42 · Cited by 653
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory
- 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11121-017-0809-x · DOI
- 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141021 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/32.4.438 · DOI
- 10.1177/1090198114547516 · DOI
- 10.1177/109019819201900306 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6963-6-30 · DOI
- Doran G. T., 1981, Management Review, 70, 35
- 10.1001/archinte.167.6.573 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077558716655451 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524839912474276 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2261-6-43 · DOI
- Kegeles S. M., 2000, AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 62
- 10.1111/jgs.13935 · DOI · Paper page
- Kurian A. K., 2007, Ethnicity & Disease, 17, 143
- 10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158136.76824.04 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller W. R., 2013, Motivational interviewing: Helping people change
- 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366 · DOI
- 10.5888/pcd10.130133 · DOI
- 10.1080/00981389.2012.671244 · DOI
- 10.1186/1748-5908-3-27 · DOI
- Rogers E. M., 1962, Diffusion of innovations
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000206 · DOI
- 10.1111/jan.13159 · DOI
- 10.1353/cpr.2017.0005 · DOI
- 10.1155/2013/605757 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.MLR.0000065128.72148.D7 · DOI
- Zenk S. N., 2006, Ethnicity & Disease, 16, 275
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Baumann, A. A., & Miller, C. J. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y · Cited by 1,329
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsay, J. E., Janevic, M. R., Hogan, C. K., Edwards, D. L., & Connell, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsay, Jessica E.
- Venue
- Health Promotion Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-05-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 760-769
- ISSN
- 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6372
- PMC
- PMC6476690
- OpenAlex
- W2803429751
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG047203)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- intervention adaptation, heart disease, self-management support, older adults, African Americans, low socioeconomic status, university-community collaboration, chronic disease, implementation barriers, Detroit
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease, Health Promotion, Humans, Michigan, Poverty, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Population, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review