Cited by 20Participatory Visual Research MethodsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Body Mapping and Story Circles in Sexual Health Research With Youth of Color: Methodological Insights and Study Findings From Adolescent X, an Art-Based Research Project

Brodyn, Adriana, Lee, Soo Young, Futrell, Elizabeth, Bennett, Ireashia, Bouris, Alida, Jagoda, Patrick, Gilliam, Melissa·2022·Health Promotion Practice

Abstract

We describe the implementation and select findings from Adolescent X, an arts-based research project that used story circles and body mapping to elucidate how young people understand the relationship between their social contexts and their sexual and reproductive health, with a particular focus on youth’s understandings of gender, sexuality, and the body as sites of possibility and power. A community-based sample of N = 24 youth of color was recruited from the South and West Sides of Chicago to participate in 3-day workshops. In addition to story circles and body mapping, data were collected via brief surveys with N = 24 youth, debriefing groups (n = 10 youth), and focus groups (n = 14 youth). Study data consisted of (1) body map visuals, that is, legends, mini-, and full-body maps; (2) written body map narratives; and (3) audio recordings of the story circles, body mapping activities, debriefing groups, and focus groups. All audio recordings were transcribed, deidentified, and uploaded in Dedoose for qualitative thematic analysis. Data analysis was conducted by a team of independent coders. Across all sources of data, three major themes were identified: (1) strong feelings of unsafety related to how young people’s bodies are gendered, sexualized, and racialized in different social settings; (2) the extent to which adults and institutions foster youth safety; and (3) sources of young people’s coping and resilience. Implications for public health research, practice, and policy are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248399211039796

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brodyn, A., Lee, S. Y., Futrell, E., Bennett, I., Bouris, A., Jagoda, P., & Gilliam, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Brodyn, Adriana
Venue
Health Promotion Practice
Published
2021-09-23
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
594-608
ISSN
  • 1524-8399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6372
OpenAlex
W3199873878
Cited by
20
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Promotion Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ford Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
body mapping, story circles, youth of color, adolescent sexual health, reproductive health, gender, sexuality, body image, racialization, sexualization, youth safety, coping and resilience, arts-based research, community-based research, Chicago
MeSH terms
Sexual Health, Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Body Image, Chicago, Humans, Research, Research Design, Sexual Behavior, Social Environment, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Black People, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review