Cited by 8Participatory Visual Research MethodsFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Pioneering Virtual Body Mapping: A Methodological Guide for Researchers Using a Health-Affected Population as an Example

Open access
Santarossa, Sara, Redding, Ashley, Murphy, Dana·2023·American Journal of Qualitative Research

Abstract

The rapidity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing recognition of post-acute sequela of COVID-19 (PASC) or long COVID-19 has created a need to understand the experience of those suffering from this long-term sequela. The purpose of this research was to explore, and uplift lived experiences of patients with long COVID-19. This study had a total sample of 19 participants with long COVID-19 engaged in body mapping, an arts-based research method. Describing the novel virtual adaptations to the body mapping methodology is the focus of this article. The material presented provides researchers with a methodological road map by outlining the virtual adaptations in the preparation and facilitation of the body mapping process, sharing lessons learned in data collection, highlighting considerations for future studies, and summarizing the impact of the findings. Virtual body mapping sessions acted as powerful and emotional events where participants showed true vulnerability describing their experiences with COVID-19, their journey as a long hauler, their places of personal strength and courage, and their dreams for the future. Participants were highly engaged and interested in sharing their art with the broader community. Virtual body mapping is a novel approach to conducting qualitative research in a unique setting and can provide an opportunity for innovative knowledge dissemination activities. While this method may contribute to increased participation and engagement, it may also present challenges, such as lessened accountability and interaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29333/ajqr/13016

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643-644.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santarossa, S., Redding, A., & Murphy, D.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Santarossa, Sara
Venue
American Journal of Qualitative Research
Publisher
www.ajqr.org
Published
2023-03-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
73-88
ISSN
2576-2141 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362720582
Cited by
8
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
American Journal of Qualitative Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
long COVID, body mapping, arts-based research, lived experience, post-COVID-19 sequelae, knowledge dissemination, methodological adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review