The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoleak as a Complication of Endoluminal Grafting of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Classification, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management
Abstract
The inability to obtain or maintain a secure seal between a vessel wall and a transluminally implanted intra-aneurysmal graft is a complication unique to the evolving technique of endovascular aneurysm exclusion. Because the term “leak” has long been associated with aneurysm rupture, the term “endoleak” is proposed as a more definitive description of this phenomenon. Embracing both persistent blood flow into the aneurysmal sac from within or around the graft (graft related) and from patent collateral arteries (nongraft related), endoleak can be classified as primary or secondary depending on the time of occurrence (within 30 days of implantation or following apparent initial seal, respectively). Diagnostic techniques to detect endoleak include arteriography, intraprocedural pressure monitoring, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, abdominal X ray, and duplex scanning. Management strategies for endoleak range from observation with periodic imaging surveillance to correction by additional endoluminal or surgical procedures. Standardization of the terminology describing this important sequela to endovascular aneurysm exclusion should facilitate uniform reporting of clinical trial data vital to the evaluation of this emerging technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transfemoral Intraluminal Graft Implantation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Parodi, J. C., Palmaz, J. C., & Barone, H. D. (1991) · Annals of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf02015271 · Cited by 3,322
Dake, M. D., Miller, D. C., Semba, C. P., Mitchell, R. S., Walker, P. J., & Liddell, R. P. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199412293312601 · Cited by 1,678
Heiken, J. P., Brink, J. A., & Vannier, M. W. (1993) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234684 · Cited by 284
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of postoperative follow-up with helical CT.
Rozenblit, A. M., Marin, M. L., Veith, F. J., Cynamon, J., Wahl, S. I., & Bakal, C. W. (1995) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484590 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
Fillinger, M. F., Greenberg, R. K., McKinsey, J. F., & Chaikof, E. L. (2010) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.008 · Cited by 697
Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease
Cheng, D., Martin, J., Shennib, H., Dunning, J., Muneretto, C., Schueler, S., Von Segesser, L., Sergeant, P., & Turina, M. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.047 · Cited by 447
Blood Pool MR Angiography of Aortic Stent-Graft Endoleak
Ersoy, H., Jacobs, P., Kent, C. K., & Prince, M. R. (2004) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821181 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- White, G. H., Yu, W., May, J., Chaufour, X., & Stephen, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-168
- ISSN
- 1526-6028 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1550
- OpenAlex
- W2145621890
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoleak as a Complication of Endoluminal Grafting of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Classification, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/152660289700400207
- The paper
- White, G. H., Yu, W., May, J., Chaufour, X., & Stephen, M. S. (1997). Endoleak as a Complication of Endoluminal Grafting of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Classification, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1177/152660289700400207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.