Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States

Berinsky, Adam J.·2005·American Politics Research

Abstract

A number of electoral reforms have been enacted in the United States in the past three decades that are designed to increase turnout by easing restrictions on the casting of ballots. Both proponents and opponents of electoral reforms agree that these reforms should increase the demographic representativeness of the electorate by reducing the direct costs of voting, thereby increasing turnout among less-privileged groups who, presumably, are most sensitive to the costs of coming to the polls. In fact, these reforms have been greatly contested because both major political parties believe that increasing turnout among less-privileged groups will benefit Democratic politicians. I review evidence from numerous studies of electoral reform to demonstrate that reforms designed to make it easier for registered voters to cast their ballots actually increase, rather than reduce, socioeconomicbiases in the composition of the voting public. I conclude with a recommendation that we shift the focus of electoral reform from an emphasis on institutional changes to a concentration on political engagement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1532673x04269419

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Alvarez, R. M. L., 2004, Point, click, andvote: The future of internet voting
  2. Alvarez, R. M., 2001, Loyola Law Review, 34, 1115
  3. Althoff, S., 2004, Boston Globe Magazine, 26
  4. 10.2307/3088376 · doi:10.2307/3088376
  5. Berinsky, A. J., 2004, Silent voices: Opinion polls and political participation in America
  6. 10.1086/322196 · doi:10.1086/322196
  7. 10.2307/798221 · doi:10.2307/798221
  8. Hajnal, Z., Journal of Politics
  9. Hanmer, M. J. (2004). From selection to election and beyond: Understanding the causes and consequences of electoral reform in America . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
  10. 10.2307/448554 · doi:10.2307/448554
  11. 10.1016/S0362-3319(01)00135-5 · doi:10.1016/s0362-3319(01)00135-5
  12. 10.2307/2131103 · doi:10.2307/2131103
  13. 10.1017/S1049096500042633 · doi:10.1017/s1049096500042633
  14. Stein, R. M., 1997, Social Science Quarterly, 78, 657
  15. Wolfinger, R., 1980, Whovotes?

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Berinsky, A. J.
Venue
American Politics Research
Published
2005-07
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
471-491
ISSN
  • 0044-7803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-673X
  • 1552-3373
OpenAlex
W2136743206
Cited by
342
References
41
FWCI
55.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1532673x04269419
The paper
Berinsky, A. J. (2005). The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. American Politics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x04269419

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.