Cited by 31Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMedia Influence and Politics

Emotions and Affective Polarization: How Enthusiasm and Anxiety About Presidential Candidates Affect Interparty Attitudes

McLaughlin, Bryan, Holland, Derrick, Thompson, Bailey A., Koenig, Abby·2020·American Politics Research

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly divided populace, this article considered how the emotions (enthusiasm and anxiety) partisans feel toward U.S. presidential candidates may heighten or diminish affective polarization. In Study 1 (American National Election Studies [ANES] 2008–2009 panel data), we found that enthusiasm for the in-group candidate and anxiety about the out-group candidate were related to higher levels of affective polarization, whereas enthusiasm for the out-group candidate was related to lower levels of affective polarization. In Study 2 (2016 panel data), we found that in-group enthusiasm was related to higher levels of affective polarization and out-group enthusiasm was related to lower levels of affective polarization, but neither in-group nor out-group anxiety was significantly related to affective polarization. These findings highlight that enthusiasm about out-group candidates may have a unique ability to disrupt affective polarization and that it is important to consider the source of an emotion response, not just the type of emotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1532673x19891423

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existe una relación directa entre la polarización y las emociones expresadas hacia los candidatos: cuanto mayor es el nivel de polarización, más ansiedad se aprecia hacia el candidato ajeno y más entusiasmo se siente por el propio.

    “Se ha demostrado una relación directa entre la polarización y las emociones expresadas hacia los candidatos: cuanto mayor es el nivel de polarización, más ansiedad se aprecia hacia el candidato ajeno y más entusiasmo se siente por el propio (McLaughlin et al., 2020)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLaughlin, B., Holland, D., Thompson, B. A., & Koenig, A.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Stephen F. Austin State University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
McLaughlin, Bryan
Venue
American Politics Research
Published
2019-12-16
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
308-316
ISSN
  • 0044-7803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-673X
  • 1552-3373
OpenAlex
W2996280272
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Politics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
affective polarization, enthusiasm, anxiety, presidential candidates, partisanship, 2016 US presidential election, 2008 presidential election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review