The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dementia Caregivers’ Responses to 2 Internet-Based Intervention Programs
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the impact on dementia caregivers’ experienced stress and health status of 2 Internet-based intervention programs. Design and methods: Ninety-one dementia caregivers were given the choice of being involved in either an Internet-based chat support group or an Internet-based video conferencing support group. Pre-post outcome measures focused on distress, health status, social support, and service utilization. Results: In contrast to the Chat Group, the Video Group showed significantly greater improvement in mental health status. Also, for the Video Group, improvements in self-efficacy, neuroticism, and social support were associated with lower stress response to coping with the care recipient’s cognitive impairment and decline in function. Implications: The results show that, of 2 Internet-based intervention programs for dementia caregivers, the video conferencing intervention program was more effective in improving mental health status and improvement in personal characteristics were associated with lower caregiver stress response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There was a trend for improvement in mental health outcomes.”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“All studies included results on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness, and some reported issues connected with implementation [33,36-38,40-44,47].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“For comparative studies, changes in pre- and postintervention results were similar for face-to-face groups [31,38] and usual care [47] but significantly better than a text-based forum [43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“For the self-help groups, one study reported attendance rates dropping from 70% when the groups were health professionally led to 50% for member-led groups [43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Two studies reported similar or higher levels of participation compared with the alternative intervention [31,43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The most common problem reported was audio difficulties, which included delays, dropouts, and background noise [33,37,38,44,45], followed by problems in downloading software [38,42,43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Results were reported as similar to face-to-face groups [38,43,47].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“some participants reported feeling more relaxed and open by being at home and valued the convenience [33,34,36,42-46].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Treatment reliability and validity was assessed in four psychoeducational studies [36,38,41,43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Videoconferencing groups were considered superior in comparison with a text-based forum, with few people contributing to the forum and threaded discussions going off-topic [43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Qualitative research: Methods in the social sciences
(2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e668352010-001 · Cited by 10,619
Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095 · Cited by 4,855
A revised version of the Psychoticism scale
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 · Cited by 3,094
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250 · Cited by 2,857
Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis
Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.946 · Cited by 1,734
Bolger, N. P., & Schilling, E. A. (1991) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x · Cited by 1,047
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Marziali E., 2008, eHealth Int, 4, 6
- Alzheimer’s Disease International., 2010, World Alzheimer’s Report; 2009
- Buckner L., 2007, Valuing Carers: Calculating the Value of Unpaid Care
- Martire LM, Schulz R. Informal caregiving to older adults: health effects of providing and receiving care. In: Baum A, Revenson T, Singer J, eds. Handbook of Health Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:477-493.
- Thompson CA, 2007, BMC Geriatr, 27, 7
- Parker D., 2008, Int J Evid Based Healthcare, 6, 137
- Wu YH, 2009, Psychol Neuropsychiat Vieil., 7, 185
- W3C., 1999, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C Recommendations
- W3C., 2003, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
- Berg BL, 1995, Methods for the Social Sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boots, L. M. M., de Vugt, M. E., van Knippenberg, R. J. M., Kempen, G. I. J. M., & Verhey, F. R. J. (2014) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4016 · Cited by 449
Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review
Banbury, A., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Parkinson, L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8090 · Cited by 336
Dam, A. E. H., de Vugt, M. E., Klinkenberg, I. P. M., Verhey, F. R. J., & van Boxtel, M. P. J. (2016) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008 · Cited by 263
Hopwood, J., Walker, N., McDonagh, L., Rait, G., Walters, K., Iliffe, S., Ross, J., & Davies, N. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9548 · Cited by 246
Evidence for telehealth group-based treatment: a systematic review
Gentry, M. T., Lapid, M. I., Clark, M. M., & Rummans, T. A. (2019) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18775855 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Marziali, E., & Garcia, L. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Marziali, Elsa
- ORCID
- Garcia, Linda J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-31
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-43
- ISSN
- 0888-4897 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3175
- 1938-2731
- PMC
- PMC10845422
- OpenAlex
- W2154531114
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Keywords
- dementia caregivers, caregiver stress, online intervention, videoconferencing, caregiver mental health, social support, self-efficacy, neuroticism, service utilization, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Dementia, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet, Videoconferencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
