Cited by 11Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCognitive Functions and Memory

Challenges With Manual-Based Multimodal Psychotherapy for People With Alzheimer’s Disease: A Case Study

Open access
Tonga, Johanne Bjoernstad, Karlsoeen, Bente Brekne, Arnevik, Espen Ajo, Werheid, Katja, Korsnes, Maria S., Ulstein, Ingun Dina·2016·American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®

Abstract

Earlier detection of dementia requires increased knowledge of how to help people in the early stages of dementia. However, few studies have focused on how psychotherapy should be adapted to improve the outcome of therapy for people with Alzheimer’s disease. The aims of the present study were to identify and to explore possible obstacles encountered during the use of manual-based psychotherapy for people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. The study found that individual adaptations to the treatment manual were necessary, particularly the modification of memory aids in order to adapt them to patients’ functional level and previous experience with modern technology. In addition, caregivers were essential for both treatment and homework completion, while reduced awareness constituted an obstacle for adherence to the manual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1533317515603958

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the 26 papers on MCI, 8 described manualized psychotherapeutic interventions and 18 described psychoeducational interventions in addition to cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, mindfulness-based stress reduction, behavioral activation, or a recovery model approach.

    “Amongst them, 8 papers described manualized psychotherapeutic interventions [36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 62–64] and 18 papers described psychoeducational interventions in addition to cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, mindfulness-based stress reduction, behavioral activation, or a recovery model approach [38, 44–54, 57–60, 65, 67].”

    From Psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Description of the Treatment (p. 3) describes a structured, manual-based psychotherapy intervention, so this paper fits the cited group of manualized interventions. However, the study concerns people with mild Alzheimer’s disease, not mild cognitive impairment (Introduction, p. 1); it does not support classifying this paper as an MCI study. The 8- and 18-paper counts are the citing authors’ aggregation, not findings attributed to this individual paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A total of five research groups have described psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

    “A total of five research groups have described psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals with mild cognitive impairment [36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 62–64].”

    From Psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction (p. 1) discusses psychotherapy and cognitive rehabilitation, and the References (p. 6) include two intervention trials in people with mild cognitive impairment. But this paper studies people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (Participants, p. 2), and it does not establish that five research groups described interventions for mild cognitive impairment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three research groups have chosen a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based approach and investigated the therapeutic effects in follow-up assessments ranging from immediate post-intervention up to 12 months follow-up.

    “Three research groups have chosen a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based approach and investigated the therapeutic effects in follow-up assessments, ranging from immediate post-intervention up to 12 months follow-up [36, 37, 39, 62–64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]13. Kurz A, Tho ¨ne-Otto A, Cramer B, et al. CORDIAL: cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive-behavioral treatment for early dementia in Alzheimer disease: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord . 2012;26(3):246-253.
  2. [18]18. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Report . 2008;13(4):544-559.
  3. [40]40. McKeownJ,ClarkeA,RepperJ.Lifestoryworkinhealthandsocial care: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs . 2006;55(2):237-247.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonga, J. B., Karlsoeen, B. B., Arnevik, E. A., Werheid, K., Korsnes, M. S., & Ulstein, I. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Venue
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®
Published
2015-09-17
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
311-317
ISSN
  • 0888-4897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3175
  • 1938-2731
OpenAlex
W2279975165
Cited by
11
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen
  • Sykehuset Telemark
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, early-stage dementia, multimodal psychotherapy, treatment adaptation, memory aids, caregivers, homework adherence, barriers to treatment
MeSH terms
Aged, Agnosia, Alzheimer Disease, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review