The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this article is to critically review current studies on employees’ adaptive performance and to integrate the findings to provide insights on how to develop employees’ adaptability. It also aims to identify gaps in the research to guide future studies on adaptive performance in the field of human resource development. By reviewing 34 empirical studies on adaptive performance published between 1999 and 2016, we identified 22 antecedents of adaptive performance at the individual (nine), job (six), group (three), and organizational (four) levels. Our analyses reveal that a significant amount of research has focused more on individual characteristics than on other aspects affecting employees’ high adaptive performance. Discussion, implications, and recommendations for future research are elaborated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future
Torraco, R. J. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316671606 · Cited by 2,031
Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612 · Cited by 1,891
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y · Cited by 377
Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes
de Lange, A. H., Van Yperen, N. W., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Bal, P. M. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.013 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Navigating the maze: the effects of algorithmic management on employee performance
Liu, M., Lan, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, M., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03453-z · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, S., & Park, S.
- Venue
- Human Resource Development Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-324
- ISSN
- 1534-4843 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6712
- OpenAlex
- W2926132137
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1534484319836315
- The paper
- Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. Human Resource Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319836315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
