Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Nine Session Treatment of a Blood–Injection–Injury Phobia With Manualized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: An Adult Case Example

Chapman, L. Kevin, DeLapp, Ryan C. T.·2014·Clinical Case Studies

Abstract

The treatment of blood-injection-injury (BII) phobia has a unique treatment component as compared with other types of specific phobias. In particular, many patients with a BII phobia distinctively experience an increased susceptibility to fainting when exposed to feared medical-related stimuli due to a diphasic physiological response. Moreover, effective treatment protocols must not only include therapeutic techniques to ameliorate the patient’s fear response but also teach strategies that will allow the patient to remain conscious during exposure to feared stimuli. The current case study describes a manualized, cognitive behavioral therapy that utilized applied muscle tension techniques to comprehensively address the multifaceted components of an adult male’s BII phobia. Treatment included a combination of psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring that provided the patient with an empirically based understanding of BII phobia, practiced using applied muscle tension techniques to better manage his physiological processes during exposure followed by the utilization of in vivo graduated exposure to reduce distress and avoidance of feared stimuli. After completing nine sessions, the patient demonstrated considerable improvement as evidenced by reductions in anxiety and the willful seeking of medical care following treatment. Further implications and future directions for research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534650113509304

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, L. K., & DeLapp, R. C. T.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Venue
Clinical Case Studies
Published
2013-10-30
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
299-312
ISSN
  • 1534-6501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3802
OpenAlex
W2096473906
Cited by
16
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Case Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
blood-injection-injury phobia, graduated exposure, syncope, psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, specific phobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review