Cited by 29Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesChronic Disease Management StrategiesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Chronic Illness and Risk Factors for Chronic Illness Among Patients With Venous Leg Ulceration: A Cross-Sectional Study

Kelly, Maria, Gethin, Georgina·2019·The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds

Abstract

Introduction. Chronic illness and risk factors for chronic illness are rising public health concerns for individuals and health care systems. Individuals with venous leg ulceration (VLU) have at least one chronic illness. As there is a projected increase in VLU prevalence there is a need to determine concurrent prevalence of risk factors for chronic illness among this population. Methods. A cross-sectional design conducted in 8 community, nurse-led, leg ulcer clinics. Results. Fifty patients (58%, n = 29 females) were enrolled. Seventy percent were >65 years old; 90% had at least one chronic illness; 60% had hypertension; 30% had atrial fibrillation; 18% had diabetes; 18% heart failure; and 28.6% musculoskeletal conditions. All had at least one risk factors for chronic illness (mean = 2.26), the most frequent being overweight (30%), obesity (30%), high cholesterol (22.2%), and restricted physical activity (22%). Participants took a mean 5.2 medications daily and 26% were on current oral antibiotics. Conclusions. Comprehensive, holistic assessment and regular reassessment with a preventative focus needs to consider chronic illness and risk factors for chronic illness. Patients with VLU are in frequent contact with their multidisciplinary team. This is an opportunity to improve care and make every encounter count.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534734619850444

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dale J, 1983, Nurs Times, 79, 49
  2. O’Meara S, 2010, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003557

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kelly, M., & Gethin, G.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Gethin, Georgina
Venue
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Published
2019-05-29
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 1534-7346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6941
OpenAlex
W2947927135
Cited by
29
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
chronic disease, comorbidities, risk factors, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, musculoskeletal disorders, obesity, overweight, physical inactivity, hypercholesterolemia, polypharmacy, oral antibiotics, nurse-led clinics
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Holistic Health, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Ireland, Leg Ulcer, Male, Risk Factors, Varicose Ulcer, Prevalence, Risk Assessment, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review