Cited by 52Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityCancer survivorship and careComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Why people living with and beyond cancer use the Internet

Open access
Holmes, Michelle Marie·2019·Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract

People living with and beyond cancer suffer with a wide range of physical and psychological symptoms. To manage the challenges associated with cancer, patients use a variety of self-management resources, including the Internet. People living with and beyond cancer use the Internet to make decisions regarding their self-care, through information provision, online communities, and support groups. Using the Internet may empower patients, enabling them to feel they have the required knowledge to discuss complementary and alternative treatment options with their health care team. Patients use the Internet because of its practicality; however, there are also several barriers affecting patients with cancer using the Internet, such as lack of information technology skills, lack of computer access, and concerns over the quality of information. Health care professionals need to be aware that the information available on the Internet plays a factor in the decision-making processes regarding using complementary and alternative medicine for self-management. With the use of the Internet as a tool for self-management continuing to grow, it is recommended that more emphasis is placed on health care professionals discussing the role the Internet plays in the decision-making process, to further support their patients regarding self-management for living with and beyond cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735419829830

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A German survey analysing the internet literacy of patients with cancer determined that while no significant differences regarding gender or age were seen, most of the patients with cancer were younger than 70 years old.

    “We defined age of more than 65 years as an exclusion criterion because a German survey analysing the internet literacy of patients with cancer determined that while no significant differences regarding gender or age were seen, most of the patients with cancer were younger than 70 years old.”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The review’s study table (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) identifies a German questionnaire survey of 255 cancer patients and reports a mean age of 63.5 years. It does not report that most participants were younger than 70 or that there were no significant differences by gender or age; a mean below 70 does not establish the claimed majority. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Holmes, Michelle Marie
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Published
2019-01
Volume
18
Pages
1534735419829830-1534735419829830
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
OpenAlex
W2912967740
Cited by
52
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
cancer survivors, internet use, self-management, online health information, online communities, support groups, complementary and alternative medicine, patient empowerment, barriers to internet use, decision-making
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Health Personnel, Humans, Neoplasms, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review