Cited by 16Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic Modeling

RxBERT: Enhancing drug labeling text mining and analysis with AI language modeling

Open access
Wu, Leihong, Gray, Magnus, Dang, Oanh, Xu, Joshua, Fang, Hong, Tong, Weida·2023·Experimental Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The US drug labeling document contains essential information on drug efficacy and safety, making it a crucial regulatory resource for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug reviewers. Due to its extensive volume and the presence of free-text, conventional text mining analysis have encountered challenges in processing these data. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for natural language processing (NLP) have provided an unprecedented opportunity to identify key information from drug labeling, thereby enhancing safety reviews and support for regulatory decisions. We developed RxBERT, a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model pretrained on FDA human prescription drug labeling documents for an enhanced application of drug labeling documents in both research and drug review. RxBERT was derived from BioBERT with further training on human prescription drug labeling documents. RxBERT was demonstrated in several tasks using regulatory datasets, including those involved in the National Institutes of Technology Text Analysis Challenge Dataset (NIST TAC dataset), the FDA Adverse Drug Event Evaluation Dataset (ADE Eval dataset), and the classification of texts from submission packages into labeling sections (US Drug Labeling dataset). For all these tasks, RxBERT reached 86.5 F1-scores in both TAC and ADE Eval classification, respectively, and prediction accuracy of 87% for the US Drug Labeling dataset. Overall, RxBERT was shown to be as competitive or have better performance compared to other NLP approaches such as BERT, BioBERT, etc. In summary, we developed RxBERT, a transformer-based model specific for drug labeling that outperformed the original BERT model. RxBERT has the potential to be used to assist research scientists and FDA reviewers to better process and utilize drug labeling information toward the advancement of drug effectiveness and safety for public health. This proof-of-concept study also demonstrated a potential pathway to customized large language models (LLMs) tailored to the sensitive regulatory documents for internal application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15353702231220669

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Roberts K, Demner-Fushman D, Tonning JM. Overview of the TAC 2017 adverse reaction extraction from drug labels track. https://tac. nist.gov/publications/2017/additional.papers/TAC2017.ADR_over- view.proceedings.pdf
  2. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Polosukhin ŁI. Attention is all you need. Adv Neur Inform Process Syst 2017;30:3762
  3. Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. https://arxiv. org/abs/1810.04805
  4. Liu P, Yuan W, Fu J, Jiang Z, Hayashi H, Neubig G. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: a systematic survey of prompting methods in natural lan- guage processing. ACM Comput Surv 2023;55:1-35
  5. Huang K, Altosaar J, Ranganath R. ClinicalBERT: modeling clini- cal notes and predicting hospital readmission. https://arxiv.org/ abs/1904.05342 · arXiv
  6. Chalkidis I, Fergadiotis M, Malakasiotis P, Aletras N, Androutsopou- los I. LEGAL-BERT: the Muppets straight out of law school. https:// arxiv.org/abs/2010.02559 · arXiv
  7. Beltagy I, Lo K, Cohan A. SciBERT: a pretrained language model for scientific text. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10676 · arXiv
  8. Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781 · arXiv
  9. Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan JD, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, Shyam P, Sastry G, Askell A. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neur Inform Process Syst 2020;33:1877-901
  10. Chowdhery A, Narang S, Devlin J, Bosma M, Mishra G, Roberts A, Barham P, Chung HW, Sutton C, Gehrmann S. PaLM: scaling language modeling with pathways. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 · arXiv
  11. Zhang S, Roller S, Goyal N, Artetxe M, Chen M, Chen S, Dewa n C, Diab M, Li X, Lin XV. OPT: open pre-trained transformer language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01068 · arXiv
  12. Sonntagbauer M, Haar M, Kluge S. Artificial intelligence: how will ChatGPT and other AI applications change our everyday medical prac- tice? Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2023;118:366-71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, L., Gray, M., Dang, O., Xu, J., Fang, H., & Tong, W.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Leihong
Venue
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Published
2023-11
Volume
248
Issue
21
Pages
1937-1943
ISSN
  • 0071-3384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3702
  • 1535-3699
OpenAlex
W4390546587
Cited by
16
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
drug labeling, FDA drug labels, BERT, BioBERT, adverse drug event detection, drug safety review, large language models, FDA drug review
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Drug Labeling, Humans, United States, Prescription Drugs, Data Mining, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review