The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/Generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing
Open accessAbstract
We extend our 2003 paper on instrumental variables and generalized method of moments estimation, and we test and describe enhanced routines that address heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent standard errors, weak instruments, limited-information maximum likelihood and k-class estimation, tests for endogeneity and Ramsey's regression specification-error test, and autocorrelation tests for instrumental variable estimates and panel-data instrumental variable estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments
Staiger, D., & Stock, J. (1994) · doi:10.3386/t0151 · Cited by 5,302 · cited 3×
“For more detailed discussion of the weak-instruments problem, see Staiger and Stock (1997), Stock, Wright, and Yogo (2002), or Dufour (2003).”
Background
Cited by
Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
Burgess, S., Thompson, S. G., & CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr036 · Cited by 3,952
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441
Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors
Palmer, T. M., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sheehan, N. A., Tobias, J. H., Timpson, N. J., Smith, G. D., & Sterne, J. A. (2012) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280210394459 · Cited by 1,289
Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest
Roodman, D., Nielsen, M. Ø., MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D. (2019) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x19830877 · Cited by 1,007
Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets
Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2066 · Cited by 780
Blunt Instruments: Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Identifying the Causes of Economic Growth
Bazzi, S., & Clemens, M. A. (2013) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.5.2.152 · Cited by 640
Reducing child undernutrition: past drivers and priorities for the post- MDG Era
Smith, L. C., & Haddad, L. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.014 · Cited by 499
Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyt093 · Cited by 452
Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems
Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1270 · Cited by 408
Extreme Weather and Civil War: Does Drought Fuel Conflict in Somalia through Livestock Price Shocks?
Maystadt, J.-F., & Ecker, O. (2014) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aau010 · Cited by 346
Causal inference with observational data
Nichols, A. (2007) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0800700403 · Cited by 339
Building the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns
Cennamo, C. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316658350 · Cited by 173
The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization
Davies, N. M., von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., Farbmacher, H., Burgess, S., Windmeijer, F., & Smith, G. D. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6358 · Cited by 140
Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference
Kim, Y., & Steiner, P. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207177 · Cited by 135
Bockstedt, J., Druehl, C., & Mishra, A. (2016) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12552 · Cited by 111
How do political institutions affect fiscal capacity? Explaining taxation in developing economies
RICCIUTI, R., SAVOIA, A., & SEN, K. (2019) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137418000097 · Cited by 67
Charter High Schools’ Effects on Long‐Term Attainment and Earnings
Sass, T. R., Zimmer, R. W., Gill, B. P., & Booker, T. K. (2016) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21913 · Cited by 53
Using Genetic Instruments to Estimate Interactions in Mendelian Randomization Studies
North, T.-L., Davies, N. M., Harrison, S., Carter, A. R., Hemani, G., Sanderson, E., Tilling, K., & Howe, L. D. (2019) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001096 · Cited by 19
Bailout for sale? The vote to save Wall Street
Dorsch, M. (2013) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9888-6 · Cited by 16
Fiori, M., Krings, F., Kleinlogel, E., & Reich, T. (2016) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2016.1215984 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S.
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-506
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W1547506455
- Cited by
- 1,272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
