Cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we introduce a Stata implementation of coarsened exact matching, a new method for improving the estimation of causal effects by reducing imbalance in covariates between treated and control groups. Coarsened exact matching is faster, is easier to use and understand, requires fewer assumptions, is more easily automated, and possesses more attractive statistical properties for many applications than do existing matching methods. In coarsened exact matching, users temporarily coarsen their data, exact match on these coarsened data, and then run their analysis on the uncoarsened, matched data. Coarsened exact matching bounds the degree of model dependence and causal effect estimation error by ex ante user choice, is monotonic imbalance bounding (so that reducing the maximum imbalance on one variable has no effect on others), does not require a separate procedure to restrict data to common support, meets the congruence principle, is approximately invariant to measurement error, balances all nonlinearities and interactions in sample (i.e., not merely in expectation), and works with multiply imputed datasets. Other matching methods inherit many of the coarsened exact matching method's properties when applied to further match data preprocessed by coarsened exact matching. The cem command implements the coarsened exact matching algorithm in Stata.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using CEM improves estimation by reducing covariate imbalance between treated and control groups.
“To remedy this, we use Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to improve the estimation by reducing the imbalance in covariates between treated and control groups (Blackwell et al. 2009, Iacus et al. 2012).”
From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Blackwell et al. 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Christensen, H. B., Floyd, E., Liu, L. Y., & Maffett, M. (2017) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.08.001 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
The effect of school closures on standardised student test outcomes
Maldonado, J. E., & De Witte, K. (2022) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3754 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Readmission diagnoses after hospitalization for severe sepsis and other acute medical conditions
Prescott, H. C., Langa, K. M., & Iwashyna, T. J. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1410 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors
Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3191 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Lou, B., & Wu, L. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16565 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine
Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.11.001 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Xue, Q., Xu, D. R., Cheng, T. C., Pan, J., & Yip, W. (2023) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-023-01029-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Jennings, L. A., Hollands, S., Keeler, E., Wenger, N. S., & Reuben, D. B. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16667 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hill, R., Yin, Y., Stein, C., Wang, X., Wang, D., & Jones, B. F. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Adolescent electronic cigarette use and tobacco smoking in the Millennium Cohort Study
Staff, J., Kelly, B. C., Maggs, J. L., & Vuolo, M. (2022) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15645 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gainous, J., Abbott, J. P., & Wagner, K. M. (2019) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9456-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment
Guo, X., Cheng, Z. (., & Pavlou, P. A. (2025) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.0307 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Milan (IT)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Blackwell, Matthew
- Iacus, Stefano
- King, Gary
- Porro, Giuseppe
- Venue
- The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 524-546
- ISSN
- 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
- 1536-8734
- OpenAlex
- W1850864270
- Cited by
- 1,689
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- coarsened exact matching, causal effect estimation, covariate balance, Stata command, model dependence, common support, principle of congruence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review