Cited by 1,689Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Cem: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata

Open access
Blackwell, Matthew, Iacus, Stefano, King, Gary, Porro, Giuseppe·2009·The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata

Abstract

In this article, we introduce a Stata implementation of coarsened exact matching, a new method for improving the estimation of causal effects by reducing imbalance in covariates between treated and control groups. Coarsened exact matching is faster, is easier to use and understand, requires fewer assumptions, is more easily automated, and possesses more attractive statistical properties for many applications than do existing matching methods. In coarsened exact matching, users temporarily coarsen their data, exact match on these coarsened data, and then run their analysis on the uncoarsened, matched data. Coarsened exact matching bounds the degree of model dependence and causal effect estimation error by ex ante user choice, is monotonic imbalance bounding (so that reducing the maximum imbalance on one variable has no effect on others), does not require a separate procedure to restrict data to common support, meets the congruence principle, is approximately invariant to measurement error, balances all nonlinearities and interactions in sample (i.e., not merely in expectation), and works with multiply imputed datasets. Other matching methods inherit many of the coarsened exact matching method's properties when applied to further match data preprocessed by coarsened exact matching. The cem command implements the coarsened exact matching algorithm in Stata.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1536867x0900900402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using CEM improves estimation by reducing covariate imbalance between treated and control groups.

    “To remedy this, we use Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to improve the estimation by reducing the imbalance in covariates between treated and control groups (Blackwell et al. 2009, Iacus et al. 2012).”

    From Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment (2025) · cites this paper as Blackwell et al. 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackwell, M., Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Blackwell, Matthew
  • Iacus, Stefano
  • King, Gary
  • Porro, Giuseppe
Venue
The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
Published
2009-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
524-546
ISSN
  • 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-8734
OpenAlex
W1850864270
Cited by
1,689
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
coarsened exact matching, causal effect estimation, covariate balance, Stata command, model dependence, common support, principle of congruence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review