Cited by 35Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingNursing care and researchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Caring load and family caregivers’ burden in China: the mediating effects of social support and social exclusion

Open access
Hu, Hongwei, Hu, Xinyi, Xu, Yang·2023·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Objective: Caring for older adults with disabilities is a source of stress for family caregivers, and the lack of social support and the pressure of social exclusion might aggravate family caregiver burden. This study aimed to examine the association between caring load and family caregivers' burden, as well as the mediating effects of social support and social exclusion. Methods: Data used in this study was derived from the nationally representative database of the aged population in China, and 3,125 households with disabled old adults and their home-bound caregivers were eventually selected for this analysis. Regression methods and mediation analysis methods were employed in this study. Results: The results indicated that there was a significant positive association between caring load and the caregiver burden, and specifically, social support intensity (rather than social support breadth) and passive social exclusion (rather than active social exclusion) played partial mediating effects. Furthermore, the contributions of mediating effects of social support intensity and passive social exclusion were 13-15 and 27-29%, respectively, and the total contribution of mediating effects was about 35-38%. Conclusion: Family caregivers' burden should be paid more attention to in the large population with rapidly aging speed like China, and more guidance services as well as support should be provided to family caregivers. In addition, it is crucial to focus on the community's social support and social exclusion in public policy innovation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194774

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In China, based on traditional Confucian filial values and relatively low levels of social security, the care of older adults with serious illnesses or disabilities is primarily undertaken by family members.

    “In China, based on traditional Confucian filial values and relatively low levels of social security, the care of older adults with serious illnesses or disabilities is primarily undertaken by family members (52).”

    From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says family caregivers provide most care for older adults with disabilities in China and links this to filial piety and an imperfect social security system. It does not establish the same claim for older adults with serious illnesses who do not have disabilities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • China has a tradition of filial piety that spans thousands of years, with family-based care long dominating the older adult care system.

    “China has a tradition of filial piety that spans thousands of years, with family-based care long dominating the older adult care system (52).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Pan G. The issue of Chinese family. Beijing: Peking University Press (1993) [in Chinese].
  2. [15]Giddens A Birdsall K. Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, H., Hu, X., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2023-09-22
Volume
11
Pages
1194774-1194774
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386959656
Cited by
35
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 1
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Renmin University of China (19XNB015)
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
family caregiver burden, social support, social exclusion, older adults with disabilities, mediating effect, population aging, China
MeSH terms
Aged, China, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Social Isolation, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review