CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipCultural Competency in Health Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spiritual Care Training Provided to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review

Paal, Piret, Helo, Yousef, Frick, Eckhard·2015·Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications
DOI 10.1177/1542305015572955
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This systematic review was conducted to assess the outcomes of spiritual care training. It outlines the training outcomes based on participants' oral/written feedback, course evaluation and performance assessment. Intervention was defined as any form of spiritual care training provided to healthcare professionals studying/working in an academic and/or clinical setting. An online search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycINFO, ASSIA, CSA, ATLA and CENTRAL up to Week 27 of 2013 by two independent investigators to reduce errors in inclusion. Only peer-reviewed journal articles reporting on training outcomes were included. A primary keyword-driven search found 4912 articles; 46 articles were identified as relevant for final analysis. The narrative synthesis of findings outlines the following outcomes: (1) acknowledging spirituality on an individual level, (2) success in integrating spirituality in clinical practice, (3) positive changes in communication with patients. This study examines primarily pre/post-effects within a single cohort. Due to an average study quality, the reported findings in this review are to be seen as indicators at most. Nevertheless, this review makes evident that without attending to one'the repeliefs and needs, addressing spirituality in patients will not be forthcoming. It also demonstrates that spiritual care training may help to challenge the spiritual vacuum in healthcare institutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1542305015572955

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Elhardt E., 2013, Spiritual Care, 1, 26
  2. Emmer R., 1984, Hospital Progress, 65, 64
  3. O’Shea E. R., 2011, Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families, 26, 34
  4. Wasner M., 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 105, 674

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 158

Related

Metadata

Authors
Paal, P., Helo, Y., & Frick, E.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Paal, Piret
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2015-03
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
19-30
ISSN
  • 1542-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-776X
DOI
10.1177/1542305015572955
OpenAlex
W2281012443
Cited by
158
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
spiritual care education, healthcare workers, spirituality in clinical practice, patient communication, spiritual care, training outcomes, course evaluation, spiritual needs of patients
MeSH terms
Chaplaincy Service, Hospital, Education, Professional, Health Personnel, Humans, Pastoral Care, Professional Competence, Religion and Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review