Cited by 354Diversity and Impact of DanceBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Randomized controlled trial of community-based dancing to modify disease progression in Parkinson disease

Duncan, Ryan P., Earhart, Gammon M.·2012·Neurorehabilitation and neural repair

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tango dancing has been effective in improving measures of physical function in people with Parkinson disease (PD). However, all previous studies were institution-based, tested participants on medication, and employed short-term interventions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a 12-month community-based tango program for individuals with PD on disease severity and physical function. METHODS: Sixty-two participants were randomly assigned to a twice weekly, community-based Argentine Tango program or a Control group (no intervention). Participants were assessed off anti-Parkinson medication at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale 3 (MDS-UPDRS-3). Secondary outcome measures were the MDS-UPDRS-1, MDS-UPDRS-2, MiniBESTest balance test; Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG_Q); 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT); gait velocity for comfortable forward, fast as possible forward, dual task, and backward walking; and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). RESULTS: Groups were not different at baseline. Overall, the Tango group improved whereas the Control group showed little change on most measures. For the MDS-UPDRS-3, there was no significant change in the Control group from baseline to 12 months, whereas the Tango group had a reduction of 28.7% (12.8 points). There were significant group by time interactions for MDS-UPDRS-3, MiniBESTest, FOG_Q, 6MWT, forward and dual task walking velocities, and 9HPT in favor of the dance group. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the Tango group were apparent off medication, suggesting that long-term participation in tango may modify progression of disability in PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1545968311421614

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, R. P., & Earhart, G. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2011-09-29
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
132-143
ISSN
  • 0888-4390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9683
  • 1552-6844
OpenAlex
W2096734197
Cited by
354
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • St. Louis American Parkinson Disease Association
  • Parkinson Vereniging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Diversity and Impact of Dance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, community-based exercise, disease progression, physical function, off-medication state, freezing of gait, balance, walking speed, dual-task walking, hand function, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Dance Therapy, Postural Balance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gait, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review