Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 713

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Communities of Practice: A Research Paradigm for the Mixed Methods Approach

Denscombe, Martyn·2008·Journal of Mixed Methods Research
DOI 10.1177/1558689808316807
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The mixed methods approach has emerged as a ``third paradigm'' for social research. It has developed a platform of ideas and practices that are credible and distinctive and that mark the approach out as a viable alternative to quantitative and qualitative paradigms. However, there are also a number of variations and inconsistencies within the mixed methods approach that should not be ignored. This article argues the need for a vision of research paradigm that accommodates such variations and inconsistencies. It is argued that the use of ``communities of practice'' as the basis for such a research paradigm is (a) consistent with the pragmatist underpinnings of the mixed methods approach, (b) accommodates a level of diversity, and (c) has good potential for understanding the methodological choices made by those conducting mixed methods research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1558689808316807

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Brewer, J., 1989, Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles
  2. Brown, J.S., 1999, Retrieved
  3. 10.4324/9780203410028 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bryman, A., 2004, Triangulation
  5. 10.1177/2345678906290531 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3102/0013189X021006013 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Collins, K.M.T., 2006, Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67
  8. Cook, T. D.,, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation
  9. Coxon, A.P., 2005, Qualitative Social Research, 6
  10. 10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X · DOI · Paper page
  11. Creswell, J.W., 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches
  12. Creswell, J.W., 2007, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
  13. Datta, L. (1994). Paradigm wars: A basis for peaceful co-existence and beyond. In C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (pp. 53-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. · DOI
  14. Denzin, N.K. (1970). Strategies of multiple triangulation (pp. 297-313). In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. New York: McGraw-Hill. · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1744987106064635 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1558689807309969 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/13563890122209504 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Greene, J.C., Kreider, H. & Mayer, E. (2005). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in social inquiry (pp. 274-281). In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage.
  19. Gorard, S., 2004, Combining methods in educational and social research
  20. Guignon, C.B. (1991). Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In D. R. Hiley, J. F. Boham, & R. Shusterman (Eds.), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture (pp. 81-101). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. · DOI
  21. 10.4324/9780203392904 · DOI
  22. Hammersley, M., 1992, What's wrong with ethnography?
  23. 10.1080/01406720500036653 · DOI
  24. 10.4135/9781848608184 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Harvey, L., 1987, Myths of the Chicago school
  26. 10.1080/01411920310001629947 · DOI
  27. Holmes, C., Paper presented at the Mixed Methods Conference, Cambridge
  28. Johnson-Lenz, P., 1999, Retrieved
  29. 10.1177/1558689806298224 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kuhn, T.S., 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions
  31. Lasswell, H.D., 1961, The qualitative and quantitative in political and legal analysis
  32. Layder, D., 1993, New strategies in social research
  33. 10.1017/CBO9781139171434.008 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Maxcy, S.J., 2003, Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism (pp. 51-90)
  35. Mayo, E., 2003, The human problems of an industrial civilization
  36. Meyer, J. (2005). Health research. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 8-9). London : Sage.
  37. Mitchell, J., 2001, Communities of practice: Reshaping professional practice and improving organisational productivity in the vocational education and training sector
  38. 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Morse, J. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design (pp. 189-208). In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. 10.1080/13645570500402447 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pring, R., 2000, Philosophy of educational research
  42. Rallis, S.F. & Rossman, G.B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework (pp. 491-512). In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  43. Reichardt, C.S., 1994, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 61, 1, 10.1002/ev.1662 · DOI
  44. Rocco, T.S., 2003, Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21, 19
  45. Roethlisberger, F.J., 2003, Management and the worker. London: Routledge (First published 1939 by
  46. Rorty, R., 1982, Consequences of pragmatism
  47. Rorty, R., 1991, In Philosophical papers, 1
  48. Silverman, D., 1985, Qualitative methodology and sociology: Describing the social world
  49. Silverman, D., 2000, Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook
  50. Somekh, B. (2005). Educational research. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 7-8). London : Sage.
  51. 10.1177/2345678906293042 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1177/1558689807302814 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Tashakkori, A., 1998, Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches
  54. Tashakkori, A.,, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research
  55. Webb, E.J., 1966, Unobtrusive measures: Non-reactive research in the social sciences
  56. Wenger, E., 1998, Systems Thinker, 9, 1
  57. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Wenger, E., 2000, Harvard Business Review, 78, 139

Cited by

See all 713

Metadata

Authors
Denscombe, M.
Venue
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-07
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
270-283
ISSN
  • 1558-6898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-6901
DOI
10.1177/1558689808316807
OpenAlex
W2115279371
Cited by
713
References
8
FWCI
103.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.