CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 308Educational Leadership and PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variabilities and Dualities in Distributed Leadership: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

Woods, Philip A., Bennett, Nigel, Harvey, Janet A., Wise, Christine·2004·Educational Management Administration & Leadership
DOI 10.1177/1741143204046497
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the concept of distributed leadership, drawing from a systematic review of relevant literature commissioned by the National College for School Leadership (NCSL) and jointly funded by NCSL and the Open University’s Centre for Educational Policy, Leadership and Lifelong Learning (CEPoLL). The concept attracts a range of meanings and is associated with a variety of practices, with varying implications for organizational processes and values. The article highlights key variables that emerged from the literature review. It then elaborates one of the emergent themes—the distinction between structure and agency—and seeks to utilize this further as a means of illuminating the concept and practice of distributed leadership. In conclusion, areas for future research are identified.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1741143204046497

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Argyris, C., 1978, Organizational Learning in Action: A Theory in Action Perspective
  2. Bennett, N., 2003, Desk Study Review of Distributed Leadership
  3. Gold, A., 2002, Educational Management & Administration, 31, 127
  4. 10.1080/13603120118390 · DOI
  5. Harris, A., International Congress on School Effectiveness and Improvement
  6. Nias, J., 1989, Staff Relationships in the Primary School
  7. O’Neill, B., 2002, Distributive Leadership: Meaning Practice
  8. Trafford, B., 2003, School Councils, School Democracy, School Improvement: What, Why, How
  9. Wallace, M., 1994, Inside the SMT

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., & Wise, C.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • University of Gloucestershire (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-10
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
439-457
ISSN
  • 1741-1432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-1440
DOI
10.1177/1741143204046497
OpenAlex
W2117305464
Cited by
307
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
39.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Educational Management Administration & Leadership (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Keywords
distributed leadership, school leadership, structure and agency, leadership theory, organizational processes, leadership practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review