Cited by 64Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns

Open access
Boniwell, Ilona·2005·International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring

Abstract

In this article questions such as "What is a good use of time?" and "How can one's relationship with time contribute to their well-being?" are raised and discussed with regard to empirical research on various aspects of psychology of time. In the fist part of the paper, the construct of time perspective is considered. It is argued that a balanced time perspective is associated with the highest levels of well-being. The second part draws on qualitative and quantitative research and addresses the concept of perceived time use. Four factors, are shown to play a major role in how people spend their time and how happy they feel with it: liking what one does and perceiving it as worthwhile, balance, responsibility and achievement, and time anxiety and lack of control. The last part of the paper considers practical implications of psychology of time for coaches and other professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/174183050500300206

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time-balance scores related more strongly to life satisfaction, positive affect, family/work satisfaction, and lower negative affect than any single time orientation did.

    “This index of time balance demonstrated stronger positive relations with life satisfaction, positive affect, and satisfaction with family and work, and inverse relations with negative affect than any of the specific time orientations (Boniwell, 2005).”

    From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as Boniwell, 2005

    The Balanced Time Perspective section (p. 6) reports that balanced time perspective correlates more strongly with life satisfaction than any individual orientation. But Table 1 shows a weaker positive-affect correlation for balance (.307) than for present hedonism (.375), and a weaker negative-affect correlation in magnitude (-.436) than for past negative orientation (-.484). The table does not report satisfaction with family or work. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Banks, R. (1983) The tyranny of time. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press Bond, M.J., & Feather, N.T. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 321-329.
  2. Boniwell, I. (2004). Use of Time and Well-being: Methodological Issues. Paper presentation, 2 nd European Conference on Positive Psychology, Pallanza, Italy, 5-8 July.
  3. Boniwell, I. & Henry, J.A. (2005). The use of time, life goals and well-being: Identifying factors of satisfaction with time use employing qualitative methodology. Paper presentation, BPS Annual Conference, Manchester University, 30 March-2 April.
  4. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P.A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.) Positive Psychology in Practice, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: The Psychology of Happiness . London: Rider Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
  6. Elliot, M. K. (1998) Time, work and meaning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pacifica Graduate Institute
  7. Epel, E., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 29 , 575-596.
  8. Gordon, W. R. and Caltabiano, M.L. (1996) Urban-rural differences in adolescent self-esteem, leisure boredom, and sensation seeking as predictors of leisure-time usage and satisfaction. Adolescence, 31(124), 883-901.
  9. Hafstrom, J.L. and Paynter, M.A. (1991) Time use satisfaction of wives: Home, farm, and labor force workload. Lifestyles, 12(2), 131-143.
  10. Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (1983). Environmental continuity, futurity and adaptation of the aged. In G. D. Rowles, & R. J. Ohta, (Eds.), Aging and Milieu (pp. 205-228). New York: Haworth Press.
  11. Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 259-265.
  12. Kazakina, E. (1999). Time perspective of older adults: relationships to attachment style, psychological well-being and psychological distress. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
  13. Lennings, C. J. (1996). Self-efficacy and temporal orientation as predictors of treatment outcome in severely dependent alcoholics. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14, 71-79.
  14. Robinson, J.P. & Godbey, G. (1997) Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time . State College: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  15. Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage.
  16. Sullivan, O and Gershuny, J. (2001) Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined, British Journal of Sociology, 52 (2), 331-347.
  17. Tyrrell, B. (1995). Time in our lives: facts and analysis on the 90s. Demos , 5 , 23-25. Journal of
  18. Zaleski, Z., Cycon, A. & Kurc, A. (2001). Future time perspective and subjective well-being in adolescent samples. In P. Schmuck, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 58-67) . Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boniwell, I.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Boniwell, Ilona
Venue
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Published
2005-11
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
61-74
ISSN
1741-8305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W94767707
Cited by
64
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International journal of evidence based coaching and mentoring (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
time perspective, psychology of time, well-being, time management, time balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review