Cited by 691Psychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchTraffic and Road SafetyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving

Open access
Zimbardo, Philip G., Keough, Kelli A., Boyd, John N.·1997·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

This research introduces a new individual difference variable, time perspective, as an important predictor of risky driving. Across three separate replications, with 2863 participants, present time perspective is significantly correlated with reported risky driving behaviors. Its effect is greater than, and independent of, the negative correlations between future time perspective and risky driving. Additionally, males are more present-oriented and report taking more risks than females, while females are more future-oriented. Regression analyses and discriminate validity assessments demonstrate that present time perspective remains an independent predictor of risky driving even when pitted against nine other measures previously reported as related to driving risk, such as, sensation seeking, impulsivity, and aggression. Although complicated by the number of factors potentially involved, it is imperative to attempt to predict such risk because of the enormous economic and psychological toll resulting from auto accidents and fatalities related to risky driving. Discussion centers on implications for education based on understanding the psychological dynamics of time perspective and links to general risk-taking and self-regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00113-x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. West, R., Elander, J. & French, D. (1992). Mild social deviance, type A personality and decision making style as predictors of self-reported driving style and crash risk. In J. Letter & G. Grecian, G. (Eds.), Behavioral research in road safety (Vol. 1, pp. l-16). Crowthorne, England: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
  2. Zaleski, Z. (Ed.) (1994). Psychology offuture orientarion. Lublin, Poland: Scientific Society of KUL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Zimbardo, Philip G.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1007-1023
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981983894
Cited by
691
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 31
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
future time perspective, risky driving behavior, time perspective, individual differences, gender differences, sensation seeking, impulsivity, aggression, risk-taking, self-regulation, road safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review