Perceptions of online informational social support among mothers in a lactation-focused virtual community: a survey study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Peer support, also described as woman-to-woman support, has been well established as an effective intervention for overcoming barriers to breastfeeding duration. To access support and receive information, mothers are likely to access social media platforms, especially given the challenges to healthcare access presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous research has established that virtual communities can promote peer-to-peer support similar to that seen in communities of practice. RESEARCH AIM: The aims of this study were to describe levels of perceived informational social support among mothers in an online virtual community and to determine which features of the virtual community were perceived most favorably by breastfeeding mothers. METHODS: The study design was a cross-sectional survey of members of an existing social media community of breastfeeding mothers with use of the Online Social Support Scale-Informational subscale, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Short Form, and additional open-ended questions during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited within a single, lactation-focused virtual community that was moderated by lactation support professionals. RESULTS: In regard to online social support specific to information seeking, the reported social support was moderate to high (M = 35.53, range = 17-48). Most items had a score average of approximately 3, indicating that participants perceived informational support "Pretty often" from their group interactions. Participants in this study had an average Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form score of 57.91, indicating a moderately high level of breastfeeding self-efficacy. Content analysis of open-ended items regarding favorable characteristics of the virtual community indicated participants appreciated the immediacy of feedback and the presence of lactation support professionals within the community. CONCLUSION: Mothers in the lactation professional-led virtual community perceived moderately high support in health information seeking and experienced moderately high breastfeeding self-efficacy. Additional work is needed to determine the impact of participation in virtual communities on breastfeeding outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various social media outlets can raise the degree of health promotion and awareness across multiple health topics.
“The included research showed that various social media outlets could raise the degree of women's health promotion [25], awareness of menstrual hygiene, understanding of breast cancer awareness [26], breastfeeding techniques [27]”
From Social Media Role and Its Impact on Public Health: A Narrative Review (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says social media communities can share breastfeeding information and reports that pro-breastfeeding groups have enhanced breastfeeding knowledge. The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) describe mothers’ perceived informational support in one lactation-focused community, but do not show that social media improved breastfeeding techniques. This citation supports the breastfeeding-information part of the sentence, not the broader claim about multiple health topics. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · see citing works
Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
Breastfeeding, S. O. (2005) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491 · Cited by 5,310 · see citing works
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk
BREASTFEEDING, S. O., Eidelman, A. I., Schanler, R. J., Johnston, M., Landers, S., Noble, L., Szucs, K., & Viehmann, L. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552 · Cited by 4,357 · see citing works
The Breastfeeding Self‐Efficacy Scale: Psychometric Assessment of the Short Form
Dennis, C. (2003) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1177/0884217503258459 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Moon, R. Y., Mathews, A., Oden, R. P., & Carlin, R. F. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14289 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The Online Social Support Scale: Measure development and validation.
Nick, E. A., Cole, D. A., Cho, S.-J., Smith, D. K., Carter, T. G., & Zelkowitz, R. L. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000558 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Shakya, P., Kunieda, M. K., Koyama, M., Rai, S. S., Miyaguchi, M., Dhakal, S., Sandy, S., Sunguya, B. F., & Jimba, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177434 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Breastfeeding: What are the Barriers? Why Women Struggle to Achieve Their Goals
Sriraman, N. K., & Kellams, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.5059 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Exploring Social Media Group Use Among Breastfeeding Mothers: Qualitative Analysis
Skelton, K. R., Evans, R. R., LaChenaye, J. M., Amsbary, J. H., Wingate, M. S., & Talbott, L. L. (2018) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/11344 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Hidden Communities of Practice in Social Media Groups: Mixed Methods Study
Skelton, K. R., Evans, R. R., & LaChenaye, J. M. (2019) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/14355 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [11]Ghazanfarpour M Afiat M Babakhanian M, et al. A systematic review of psychometric properties of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF). Int J Pediatrics 2018; 6(12): 8619– 8630.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media Role and Its Impact on Public Health: A Narrative Review
Kanchan, S., & Gaidhane, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.33737 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Internet‐based breastfeeding peer support for breastfeeding parents: An integrative review
Hiito, E., Ikonen, R., & Niela‐Vilén, H. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16221 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Devi, P. U., Beake, S., & Chang, Y. (2024) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.13708 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Bloom, B. E., Bragg, M. A., Jay, M. R., Harel, D., Cline, C., Crowe, M., Montoya, A., Muthuramalingam, S., Santana, R., & Albert, S. L. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/66400 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gabriel, M. Á. M., Lozoya, S. M., Ibarra, S. D. L. H., Comeche, L. D., Carrasco, E. G., Mallada, P. L., Sirerol, N. V., Fernández, L. G., Martínez, J. J., & Royuela, A. (2023) · International Breastfeeding Journal · doi:10.1186/s13006-023-00590-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Impactos das mídias sociais no contexto do aleitamento materno
Nunes, M. E. C., & de Oliveira, A. E. C. (2026) · Saúde Coletiva (Barueri) · doi:10.36489/saudecoletiva.2026v17i106p19648-19665
Öztoprak, P. U., & Calpbinici, P. (2026) · Mersin üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri dergisi/Mersin üniversitesi sağlık bilimleri dergisi · doi:10.26559/mersinsbd.1802608
- Authors
- Munyan, K., & Kennedy, E.
- Affiliations
- New Mexico Highlands University (US)
- Oakland University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Munyan, Kristen
- ORCID
- Munyan, Kristen
- Venue
- Women s Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 17455057221125088-17455057221125088
- ISSN
- 1745-5057 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-5065
- PMC
- PMC9516422
- OpenAlex
- W4297129878
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- breastfeeding, breastfeeding support, online communities, online peer support, breastfeeding self-efficacy, mothers, social media, COVID-19 pandemic, health information seeking
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Breast Feeding, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Lactation, Mothers, Social Support, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
