Cited by 340Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Deny, Distance, or Dismantle? How White Americans Manage a Privileged Identity

Open access
Knowles, Eric D., Lowery, Brian S., Chow, Rosalind M., Unzueta, Miguel M.·2014·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Social scientists have traditionally argued that whiteness-the attribute of being recognized and treated as a White person in society-is powerful because it is invisible. On this view, members of the racially dominant group have the unique luxury of rarely noticing their race or the privileges it confers. This article challenges this "invisibility thesis," arguing that Whites frequently regard themselves as racial actors. We further argue that whiteness defines a problematic social identity that confronts Whites with 2 psychological threats: the possibility that their accomplishments in life were not fully earned (meritocratic threat) and the association with a group that benefits from unfair social advantages (group-image threat). We theorize that Whites manage their racial identity to dispel these threats. According to our deny, distance, or dismantle (3D) model of White identity management, dominant-group members have three strategies at their disposal: deny the existence of privilege, distance their own self-concepts from the White category, or strive to dismantle systems of privilege. Whereas denial and distancing promote insensitivity and inaction with respect to racial inequality, dismantling reduces threat by relinquishing privileges. We suggest that interventions aimed at reducing inequality should attempt to leverage dismantling as a strategy of White identity management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691614554658

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • White youth are socialized into a society that rewards both whiteness and silence on whiteness-denial about, ignorance of, and self‐distancing from the racist status quo.

    “White youth are socialized into a society that rewards both whiteness and silence on whiteness—denial about, ignorance of, and self‐distancing from the racist status quo (Knowles et al., 2014; Spanierman & Cabrera, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M., & Unzueta, M. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2014-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
594-609
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2144841272
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
whiteness, White Americans, privilege, denial, distancing, dismantling, racial inequality, anti-racism interventions, dominant group members
MeSH terms
Awareness, Humans, Models, Psychological, Race Relations, Self Concept, Social Identification, United States, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review