Cited by 340Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deny, Distance, or Dismantle? How White Americans Manage a Privileged Identity

Open access
Knowles, Eric D., Lowery, Brian S., Chow, Rosalind M., Unzueta, Miguel M.·2014·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Social scientists have traditionally argued that whiteness-the attribute of being recognized and treated as a White person in society-is powerful because it is invisible. On this view, members of the racially dominant group have the unique luxury of rarely noticing their race or the privileges it confers. This article challenges this "invisibility thesis," arguing that Whites frequently regard themselves as racial actors. We further argue that whiteness defines a problematic social identity that confronts Whites with 2 psychological threats: the possibility that their accomplishments in life were not fully earned (meritocratic threat) and the association with a group that benefits from unfair social advantages (group-image threat). We theorize that Whites manage their racial identity to dispel these threats. According to our deny, distance, or dismantle (3D) model of White identity management, dominant-group members have three strategies at their disposal: deny the existence of privilege, distance their own self-concepts from the White category, or strive to dismantle systems of privilege. Whereas denial and distancing promote insensitivity and inaction with respect to racial inequality, dismantling reduces threat by relinquishing privileges. We suggest that interventions aimed at reducing inequality should attempt to leverage dismantling as a strategy of White identity management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691614554658

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Allport G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
  2. 10.1177/0956797610384741 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/a0011990 · DOI
  4. Baldwin J. A., 1965, Ebony, 20, 47
  5. Bennet L., 1965, Ebony, 20, 29
  6. 10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1006/jesp.1996.0018 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1364 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01163.x · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ejsp.348 · DOI
  11. 10.1525/9780520938755 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/ejsp.175 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jesp.2001.1512 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/a0031017 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0146167212475224 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0007123401000102 · DOI
  20. Clark K. B., 1965, Ebony, 20, 69
  21. 10.1023/A:1022148418210 · DOI
  22. Deaux K., 1996, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 777
  23. Delgado R., 1997, Critical White studies: Looking behind the mirror
  24. 10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dyson M. E., 2000, I may not get there with you: The true Martin Luther King, Jr
  26. 10.1215/9780822381044-004 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.669 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/15298868.2011.556804 · DOI
  30. 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00712.x · DOI
  32. Haney-López I., 1996, White by law: The legal construction of race
  33. Haney-López I., 2014, Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class
  34. 10.2307/1341787 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.403 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1268 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Higgins E. T., 1996, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 133
  39. 10.1177/0146167202239047 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893 · DOI
  41. Kelley H. H., 1987, Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, 1
  42. 10.1080/15298868.2010.542015 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/a0013595 · DOI
  44. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223 · DOI
  45. Kozol J., 1991, Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools
  46. Lipsitz G., 1998, The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics
  47. 10.1037/a0024598 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0146167207303016 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/0146167292183006 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Macrae C. N., 1996, Stereotypes and stereotyping
  52. 10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/002200278102500401 · DOI
  54. 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122322 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.511 · DOI
  56. McIntosh P., 2004, Race, class, and gender: An integrated study, 188
  57. 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Morris M. W., 2001, Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, 143
  59. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.331 · DOI
  60. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Nagel T., 1986, The view from nowhere
  62. 10.1177/1745691611406922 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01810.x · DOI
  64. Oliver M. L., 1995, Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality
  65. 10.1215/9780822383659 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.918 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1177/0146167206287182 · DOI
  68. 10.1080/10478401003676501 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/0146167204271713 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/0004-5608.00182 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Roediger D. R., 1991, The wages of whiteness: Race and the making of the American working class
  73. 10.1177/0146167207311200 · DOI
  74. Saguy T., 2009, Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities, 213
  75. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00562.x · DOI
  76. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_4 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378 · DOI
  78. 10.1215/9780822381044-003 · DOI
  79. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805 · DOI
  80. 10.1080/10463280601095240 · DOI
  81. 10.1177/1368430209344869 · DOI
  82. 10.1037/a0032250 · DOI
  83. Sidanius J., 2000, Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America, 191
  84. 10.1177/106939719502900302 · DOI
  85. 10.1177/0146167296226008 · DOI
  86. Smith E. R., 2008, Handbook of emotions, 428
  87. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1177/0146167299025004008 · DOI
  89. 10.1177/0146167201275007 · DOI
  90. 10.1177/0956797610392926 · DOI
  91. Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory
  92. 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.017 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.001 · DOI
  95. 10.1002/ejsp.259 · DOI
  96. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 · DOI
  97. Weber M., 2001, The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism
  98. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.635 · DOI
  99. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00440.x · DOI
  100. 10.1002/ejsp.2420250102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–278 of 278

Metadata

Authors
Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M., & Unzueta, M. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2014-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
594-609
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2144841272
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
18.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
whiteness, White Americans, privilege, denial, distancing, dismantling, racial inequality, anti-racism interventions, dominant group members
MeSH terms
Awareness, Humans, Models, Psychological, Race Relations, Self Concept, Social Identification, United States, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review