Cited by 241Health disparities and outcomesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loneliness Across Phylogeny and a Call for Comparative Studies and Animal Models

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Cacioppo, Stephanie, Cole, Steven W., Capitanio, John P., Goossens, Luc, Boomsma, Dorret I.·2015·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Loneliness typically refers to the feelings of distress and dysphoria resulting from a discrepancy between a person’s desired and achieved levels of social relations, and there is now considerable evidence that loneliness is a risk factor for poor psychological and physical health. Loneliness has traditionally been conceptualized as a uniquely human phenomenon. However, over millions of years of evolution, efficient and manifold neural, hormonal, and molecular mechanisms have evolved for promoting companionship and mutual protection/assistance and for organizing adaptive responses when there is a significant discrepancy between the preferred and realized levels of social connection. We review evidence suggesting that loneliness is not a uniquely human phenomenon, but, instead, as a scientific construct, it represents a generally adaptive predisposition that can be found across phylogeny. Central to this argument is the premise that the brain is the key organ of social connections and processes. Comparative studies and animal models, particularly when integrated with human studies, have much to contribute to the understanding of loneliness and its underlying principles, mechanisms, consequences, and potential treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691614564876

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Egidi G., 2008, 20th Annual Meeting of the Association for Psycho-logical Science
  2. Mason W. A., 1970, Early experience on visual information processing in perceptual and reading disorders, 302
  3. Peplau L. A., 1979, New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory, 53
  4. Tillich P., 1959, The meaning of death, 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 239

Metadata

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Cole, S. W., Capitanio, J. P., Goossens, L., & Boomsma, D. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2015-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
202-212
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2105989054
Cited by
241
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17
FWCI
24.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011107)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG033590)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
loneliness, social connectedness, social behavior, brain and social behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Loneliness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review