Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Shifting Architecture of Cognition and Brain Function in Older Adulthood

Open access
Spreng, R. Nathan, Turner, Gary R.·2019·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Cognitive aging is often described in the context of loss or decline. Emerging research suggests that the story is more complex, with older adults showing both losses and gains in cognitive ability. With increasing age, declines in controlled, or fluid, cognition occur in the context of gains in crystallized knowledge of oneself and the world. This inversion in cognitive capacities, from greater reliance on fluid abilities in young adulthood to increasingly crystallized or semanticized cognition in older adulthood, has profound implications for cognitive and real-world functioning in later life. The shift in cognitive architecture parallels changes in the functional network architecture of the brain. Observations of greater functional connectivity between lateral prefrontal brain regions, implicated in cognitive control, and the default network, implicated in memory and semantic processing, led us to propose the default-executive coupling hypothesis of aging. In this review we provide evidence that these changes in the functional architecture of the brain serve as a neural mechanism underlying the shifting cognitive architecture from younger to older adulthood. We incorporate findings spanning cognitive aging and cognitive neuroscience to present an integrative model of cognitive and brain aging, describing its antecedents, determinants, and implications for real-world functioning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691619827511

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 116 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.122 · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.3 · DOI
  3. Reyna V. F., 2011, Developmental Review, 31, 180
  4. Samanez-Larkin G. R., 2013, APS Observer, 26, 30
  5. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.203 · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.203 · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.631 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.631
  7. Spreng R. N., 2019, The aging brain: Functional adaptation across adulthood
  8. 10.1093/med/9780195369298.003.0009 · doi:10.1093/med/9780195369298.003.0009
  9. Yarchoan M., 2012, Brain, 135, 3749

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
523-542
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2942192867
Cited by
256
References
116
FWCI
35.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Funders
Canadian Institute of Health Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Shifting Architecture of Cognition and Brain Function in Older Adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1745691619827511
The paper
Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2019). The Shifting Architecture of Cognition and Brain Function in Older Adulthood. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619827511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.