Cited by 135

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Academic Experiences No One Talks About: Repeated Rejection, Impostor Syndrome, and Burnout

Jaremka, Lisa M., Ackerman, Joshua M., Gawronski, Bertram, Rule, Nicholas O., Sweeny, Kate, Tropp, Linda R., Metz, Molly A., Molina, Ludwin, Ryan, William S., Vick, S. Brooke·2020·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Academic life is full of learning, excitement, and discovery. However, academics also experience professional challenges at various points in their career, including repeated rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout. These negative experiences are rarely talked about publicly, creating a sense of loneliness and isolation for people who presume they are the only ones affected by such setbacks. However, nearly everyone has these experiences at one time or another; therefore, talking about them should be a normal part of academic life. The goal of this article is to explore and destigmatize the common experiences of rejection, impostor syndrome, and burnout by sharing a collection of short personal stories from scholars at various stages of their careers with various types of academic positions. Josh Ackerman, Kate Sweeny, and Ludwin Molina discuss how they have dealt with repeated rejection. Linda Tropp, Nick Rule, and Brooke Vick share experiences with impostor syndrome. Finally, Bertram Gawronski, Lisa Jaremka, Molly Metz, and Will Ryan discuss how they have experienced burnout.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691619898848

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Brown B., 2015, Rising strong: The reckoning. The rumble. The revolution
  2. 10.1037/a0038324 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.218 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hardin C. D., 1996, Handbook of motivation and cognition. Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context, 28
  8. 10.1111/1467-9280.00272 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jeffers S., 2017, Feel the fear and do it anyway
  10. Kay K., 2014, The confidence code: The science and art of self-assurance–what women should know
  11. Lovitts B. E., 2001, Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study
  12. 10.1037/a0025135 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.55 · DOI
  14. Obama M., 2018, Becoming Michelle Obama
  15. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1099-9809.13.4.321 · DOI
  18. Soibel A., 2012, Individual Differences Research, 10, 193
  19. 10.1038/nj7322-467a · DOI
  20. 10.1002/per.497 · DOI
  21. 10.1242/jcs.033340 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Young N., 1970, On After the gold rush [record]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Jaremka, L. M., Ackerman, J. M., Gawronski, B., Rule, N. O., Sweeny, K., Tropp, L. R., Metz, M. A., Molina, L., Ryan, W. S., & Vick, S. B.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2020-04-21
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
519-543
ISSN
  • 1745-6916
  • 1745-6924
Cited by
135
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review