The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memories, memory studies and my iPhone: Editorial
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Google uses publicly available online or other public source information to train its AI models and build products and features.
“Google, for instance, in its privacy policy, states that it uses ' information that ' s publicly available online or from other public sources to help train Google ' s AI models and build products and features using these foundational technologies. 17 '”
From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Allen, D., 2001, Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity
- Barnier, A.J., 2008, Special Issue, ‘Perspectives on Social Cognition, 9, 33
- Chalmers, D. ( 2008) ‘Foreword’, in A. Clark, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, pp. ix-xvi. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1750698007083889 · DOI
- Dixon, R.A., 1996, ‘Collaborative Memory and Aging’
- Drayson, Z., Neuroethics
- 10.1177/1750698007083888 · DOI
- Harris, C.B., 2008, Special Issue, ‘Collective Memory: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches, 16, 213
- Harris, C.B., 2010, ‘We Remember, We Forget: Collaborative Remembering in Older Couples’
- Harris, C.B., Special Issue, ‘Silence and Memory, 18, 185
- Morris, J.C., 2004, Neurobiology of Aging, 25, S137, 10.1016/S0197-4580(04)80459-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awm238 · DOI · Paper page
- Stone, C.B., Memory (Special Issue, ‘Silence and Memory’), 18, 170
- Sutton, J., 2008, Coordination, Distribution’, Social Research, 75, 23
- Sutton, J., Memory Studies, 2, 299, 10.1177/1750698008340182 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1750698008093794 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64
“…in media and communication studies that considers how media (images, templates, narratives) are used to ‘ premediate ’ (Brown and Hoskins 2010; Erll 2008; Grusin 2004, 2010; Hoskins and O ’ Loughlin 2009) what is to come, to help make the future plausible and thus more manageable and controllable.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnier, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Barnier, Amanda J.
- ORCID
- Barnier, Amanda J.
- Venue
- Memory Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-297
- ISSN
- 1750-6980 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-6999
- OpenAlex
- W2136982228
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memory Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Macquarie University
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- memory, smartphones, mobile technology, personal memories, digital memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
