Cited by 647Attachment and Relationship DynamicsCognitive Science and Education ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Cognitive Interdependence in Close Relationships

Wegner, Daniel M., Giuliano, Toni, Hertel, Paula T.·1985·Compatible and Incompatible Relationships

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_12

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transactive memory systems can also be used intentionally by deciding who will try to remember what.

    “Importantly, transactive memory systems can also be used intentionally by deciding who will try to remember what (e.g., based on the individuals' expertise).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Wegner et al., 1985

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T.
Venue
Compatible and Incompatible Relationships
Published
1985
Pages
253-276
OpenAlex
W1606743226
Cited by
647
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 22
FWCI
4.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
close relationships, group mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review