The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development
Open accessAbstract
Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future developmentAlthough a scholarly topic over the centuries, emotion was first scientifically approached by Darwin (1872), who advocated a functional approach.Soon after, James (1890) started a debate about the elicitation and differentiation of the emotions and even about the very definition of the term emotion, that still continues.There have been periods of dominance for certain theories, like Tomkins' (1962) revival of Darwin's ideas in the form of discrete or basic emotion theory, a revival of peripheral theories by Schachter (1964), and various revivals of Wundt's (1896) dimensional theory.In the 1960's, Arnold (1960) and Lazarus (1966) pioneered a new theoretical approach called appraisal theory, which is in essence a systematization of ancient ideas about emotion, reflecting the ideas of Aristotle, Hume (1739-40), Spinoza (1677), and Sartre (1939).In the 1980's this approach took on new vigor, with a number of theorists proposing variants of appraisal theory, developing concrete predictions, and testing them empirically.Since then, "appraisal" has become a household word in emotion research, but the term is used in widely different forms and different theoretical and atheoretical contexts.This special issue attempts to delineate the fundamental architecture of a family of theories that can be rightly called appraisal theories in a strict sense.In this issue we discuss the design features of these theories, their current development, and the empirical support for them, as well as unresolved issues, new developments, and critical objections.Four major contributions outline the scope of the current debate and a group of commentators provide a critical echo.In this special issue we will focus on the theories of Arnold (1960), Lazarus (1991), Scherer (1984, 2009), Smith and Ellsworth (1985, Ellsworth, 1991), Frijda (1986, 2007), Roseman (1984), andClore andOrtony (2000).The basic premise of appraisal theories is that emotions are adaptive responses, which reflect appraisals of features of the environment that are significant for the organism's well-being.Many other emotion theories also see emotions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113 · cited 2×
“Unlike other emotion theories that vaguely propose that cognitions contribute to emotions (Barrett, 2009; Russell, 2003; Schachter, 1964), appraisal theories specify the appraisal criteria or variables that are most important in differentiating emotions.”
BackgroundThe Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays
Frankfurt, H. G. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818172 · Cited by 2,634
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Self-citationThe Human Amygdala: An Evolved System for Relevance Detection
Sander, D., Grafman, J., & Zalla, T. (2003) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro.2003.14.4.303 · Cited by 944
The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy.
Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699938708408361 · Cited by 832
Self-citationAppraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899 · Cited by 827
Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework.
Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.219 · Cited by 760 · cited 2×
“The feeling component is often seen as the conscious reflection of the changes in some (Lambie & Marcel, 2002) or all (Scherer, 2004) other components.”
BackgroundFeelings integrate the central representation of appraisal-driven response organization in emotion
Scherer, K. R. (2004) · Feelings and Emotions · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806582.009 · Cited by 221
Self-citation
Cited by
Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects
Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.940781 · Cited by 5,229
Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty
Carleton, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,104
Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review
Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R., & Christoff, K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000096 · Cited by 745
Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all?
Carleton, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.03.011 · Cited by 647
Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L., Bhullar, N., Aquino, S. D., Marot, T., Schermer, J. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H.
- Venue
- Emotion Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-124
- ISSN
- 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-0747
- OpenAlex
- W2109474021
- Cited by
- 1,661
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 73.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1754073912468165
- The paper
- Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development. Emotion Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.